SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J. P. who wrote (10827)5/27/2003 8:58:17 PM
From: Les HRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
looks like we're all living in Alan's world

biz.yahoo.com

money supply was doing diddly until he was reappointed on April 22nd. it's now up 110 billion dollars in the month since.

maybe there's a quid pro quo by the old geezer.

he was nominated by Clinton at the beginning of February 2000 and the market went on another vertical leap. same after he was sworn in mid-June. market went almost back to the old highs by September.



To: J. P. who wrote (10827)5/27/2003 9:08:18 PM
From: Elroy JetsonRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
In the long-term, real estate prices exactly match the growth in GDP.

In the long-term, stock prices match the growth in corporate profits.

In the short-run, stocks and real estate are supposed to match the fantasy projections of stock brokers and realtors.

The short-run and long-term are alternate realities which periodically intersect in normal space-time.



To: J. P. who wrote (10827)5/28/2003 12:23:57 PM
From: Mr. SunshineRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
<<What is the rule of thumb average increase in property values that realtors traditionally use? For example, investment pros say that the major stock averages will increase around 10 percent per year over the long haul (give or take 2 percent).
What is the mean? Over the long haul does Real Estate appreciate by 2 or 5 or 10 or 20 percent per year?>>

This is highly dependent on area, but on average real estate appreciates at about 4-6%, give or take 2%, over the long term. The big advantage, and why so many can make $$$$millions in real estate, is leverage. For example, say you buy a 100K house with 10%, or $10K down. 10 years later the house value would be just under $165K (100K @ 5% compounded), for a $65K gain. But you can figure the gains based upon the cash you put into it, or the downpayment. A $65K gain on a $10K downpayment in 10 years equates to an annualized return of over 28%.

The costs of maintaining the property (mortgage, taxes, maintenance, etc.) can be discounted if they are in line with what you would have to pay in rent. (Often the costs to own a home are more than rent for the first few years, but as rents increase and most of the home costs, especially the mortgage, remain constant, the cost to own a home are less than renting in the long term). There are also tax advantages for owners, but not renters, which make owning more affordable.

Of course leverage works both ways - if property values go down you will lose more on a percentage basis than on an unleveraged investment that goes down by a similar amount.

<<Or are we in a "new paradigm"? >>

IMO, no.

Hope this helps.

Steve