SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tsigprofit who wrote (1651)5/28/2003 1:47:22 PM
From: Greg or e  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20773
 
I'm not a GB lackey I'm not even an American. If there are charges that can be proved against GB then I say let them come forward. If there is so much evidence why don't you put your money where your mouth is and file a suit? I see that you don't like the facts and wish to change the subject away from Clinton's conduct. Perhaps the impending shortage of hockey pucks?



To: tsigprofit who wrote (1651)5/28/2003 8:52:35 PM
From: The Philosopher  Respond to of 20773
 
They were treasonous, during that time, IMHO.

Are you using the term treasonous in its generic sense, or its legal sense?

If the former, then that's an opinion of yours that I can't argue with.

If the latter, I doubt you can defend the statement, though maybe you can. But treason is a pretty specific crime that has to be proved in pretty specific ways.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News