Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rat dog micro-cap picks... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WhatsUpWithThat who wrote (12190)	5/31/2003 9:06:09 AM
From: xcr600	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 48461

<<Is the real issue that we're going to run out of exploitable cheap labor, as each area goes through the progression to higher wages as they develop? What effect would THAT have, if we had to pay $50 a day instead of $5, minimum, for inexpensive labour? Is that what you meant by economic problems?>> What a horrible thing that would be for the thousands of Nike workers to finally outearn as a group what Michael Jordan is paid by Nike simply for endorsements.. Ditto Lebronne James. (I really don't care. I don't buy Nike crud but it amazes me that Jordan is paid more than their entire workforce is paid to make their products)

To: WhatsUpWithThat who wrote (12190)	5/31/2003 1:27:49 PM
From: dan6	Respond to of 48461

good thoughts, wuwt another way of looking at things, is that we are contributing to GLOBAL REST (as opposed to american civil unrest) by distributing jobs and wealth all around the world to the poorest people who need it the most. our loss is their gain. this does not make americans who lose jobs any happier, but economics, like all dynamic systems, must constantly deal with 'dialectical synthesis,' figuring out ways of balancing the needs of opposing forces. dangerous...? yes. new...? no. -dan6