SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KLP who wrote (99850)6/2/2003 2:23:45 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Here's a prediction from someone who is familiar with the actual situation, instead of making generalizations on how guerilla wars 'must' develop:

A Step Beyond the Aqaba Conference
By Yisrael Ne'eman

One should expect Ariel Sharon to be preparing for a letdown at the Aqaba Conference this Wednesday. US President George Bush may force a verbal agreement between Israel and the Palestinians but the proof of success will be on the ground. The Palestinians will promise a 'hudna' or temporary cease-fire or abstention from terror attacks for anywhere from three weeks to three months. Palestinian PM Abu Mazen hopes he can negotiate such a deal with the Palestinian opposition. Chances of success are miniscule and who needs a temporary cease-fire?

Sharon and (apparently) the Americans are demanding a mutual recognition of Israel as a ‘Jewish’ state and Palestine as an ‘Arab’ state. Sharon is willing, while the Palestinians are not, since it undermines their claim for 'refugee return' to Israel.

The PM is planning for the great failure with the demarcation security fence as his centrist fallback. What falls west of the line will remain in Israel, to the east he can be expected to begin dismantling illegal (by Israeli law) proto-settlements. This will go over well with the US and the Peres led Labor Party. It will force his right wing coalition partners into the opposition (see yesterday’s article).

More importantly it will trap the Palestinians. From a 95% success in halting terror attacks in central Israel, one can expect an over 99% rate with the fence operating as it should. There is a big difference when a homicide/suicide bomber believes he/she has a one in twenty chance of success as opposed to a less than 1% shot. Politically this will start becoming Israel’s de facto compromise border. According to peace activist and Ma’ariv columnist Ben Dror Yemini, even the supposed Palestinian moderates who fifteen years ago opposed terrorism, were willing to relent on ‘refugee return’ and advocated a two state solution, now demand a fight to the end. Palestinian actions will contradict Abu Mazen’s declarations. And from the shadows Palestinian Authority Chairman Arafat, can be expected to stand firmly behind all terror activities.

But the security fence will take on a much more painful function. It will keep out illegal Palestinian workers looking for a day’s wage in Israel to feed their hungry families. Security forces have rounded up tens of thousands over the past two and a half years and shipped them back to the Palestinian areas. Nowadays they are not fined since they have no money, nor held in jail since Israel does not want to feed and look after them. And after all they did not really commit a ‘crime’. The economic pressure will become intolerable as they will not be able to cross the fence.

Cynical but true, resistance functions best when a population is one or two levels above destitution, meaning there is still enough to eat and get by. The separation fence will plunge the average Palestinian into grinding poverty. Israel’s approach is two pronged in breaking the Palestinian Low Intensity Conflict (LIC) and terror offensive. The security forces have shattered the major terror organizations and what is left is working out of disconnected, inexperienced cells. Popular support exists but will be undermined when the economic glimmer of hope will be dashed by the fence.

Israel succeeded in breaking the real Palestinian national uprising or ‘intifada’ of 1987 – 91 through economic and security measures. The objective is the same this time, just that this time a compromise may be enforced.

Sharon, with popular backing (and US compliance?) is preparing his centrist dictate.
chodoff.blogspot.com



To: KLP who wrote (99850)6/2/2003 11:02:57 AM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
US can't MAKE either side (Israel or Palestine) do anything they don't want to do. Unfortunately!

Of course it can. Just as it has a great deal of influence with the Palestinians and the Arab states do as well. Whether the US chooses to use its influence and, if so, how, is the issue. Not that it cannot.