SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (99923)6/3/2003 9:05:18 AM
From: thames_sider  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
After all, we found several prominent terrorist leaders in Baghdad, didn't we?

Did we? I hadn't seen this. Any links?

Abu Nidal was in Iraq, but was a) out of action for decades, b) nothing particularly to do with Iraq when active, I thought backed by Syria, c) not an 'official' guest, and d) probably executed by Saddam's security forces (such a loss). He's the only terrorist I recall us finding in Saddam's area - there was the AQ camp up north, but this was in the Kurdish/no-fly zone so Saddam had no say in what happened there anyhow.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (99923)6/4/2003 1:47:21 AM
From: D. Long  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Can you imagine it?? 25,000 to 50,000 people DEAD.. all from one attack??

That's something that absolutely horrified me on 911. Some journalist noted on the TV that the towers usually have 10,000 people in them coming to work at that hour. 10,000... they didn't know how many were unaccounted for yet. Horrific.

Derek



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (99923)6/4/2003 10:15:10 AM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Hi, Hawk

I fully adopt Robert Baer's views that the next catastrophic attack will take place in Saudi Arabia's oil fields. It makes sense since it simulataneously delivers enormous economic blows to both the West and the Saudi Royal family.

It's just a matter of time.