Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (170524)	6/4/2003 3:34:05 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1580034

I asked - isn't murder already a crime? I guess I don't care about the hate part in this example, since the capital offense of murder should be good enough for the death penalty in Texas already. How about if they robbed the person before killing them or raped them or tortured them, or how about if they raped them and then tortured them and left them for dead? Why would you think that they would stop at one crime? Why do you care how many books are thrown at these pigs? Why are you trying to protect them? Having someone serve multiple life sentences is just as silly when one should be enough. They might get two years for rape and two years for robbery. Murder is not always the end result. These guys are stupid enough to believe that most people would agree with their actions. Well, maybe they're not that stupid. In any case, I, for one, would be pissed if they got off with four years. I mean how many lives do criminals have anyway? Who gives a sh*t? What skin is it off your nose?