SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (170530)6/4/2003 3:51:05 PM
From: d[-_-]b  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580037
 
tejek,

re:Murder is not always the end result.

In the example it was.

I personally don't think we need a hate crime bill. It's sort of like the moving target of what is pornography - I know it when I see it. Someone on the left such as yourself should see the slippery slope of defining what hate is. How about if I hate pediphiles? Should they be protected too?

Now if I assault one, we have laws for that already. It seems rather redundant, feel good legislation - typical "There we've done something" liberal crap that gives our lawyers more food at the trough.



To: tejek who wrote (170530)6/4/2003 7:59:03 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580037
 
They might get two years for rape and two years for robbery. In any case, I, for one, would be pissed if they got off with four years.

Then push for stronger sentences for rape and robbery. You will get a lot of support from conservatives.

Or is four years for rape and robbery ok if it wasn't racially motivated??

Tim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News