Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (100772)	6/8/2003 10:25:36 PM
From: kumar	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

A little more than half a century ago, Vinayak Savarkar was on trial for his life, accused of conspiring with seven other men in the assassination of Mohandas K. Gandhi on Jan. 30, 1948. The court acquitted Savarkar, citing insufficient evidence, but there was never much doubt about where his sympathies lay If There was insufficient evidence, how could there be proof beyond reasonable doubt ? I dont subscribe to the line of thought of that organization, but I do feel, gross generalization is flawed. ..... <Point examples over a few years do not make your point> Never lived in India. Yes, that's my view. Do you want to debate, or curse? Debate when without bias is my preference. When you live in India for a few years and then express your opinions on your life there, I will be happy to listen and discuss. I dont express too many opinions on life in the US, coz I have not lived here long enough. I have lived in India for more than half my life. Why dont you spend a few years there, and then see if your Hindu/Muslim slant is valid ?