Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (100972)	6/10/2003 9:13:13 AM
From: NickSE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Hey, if the FBI can't find WMDs in that pond they're draining, does that mean there were no anthrax attacks? Imho, it appears to be another "right-wing" conspiracy to invade Maryland.

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (100972)	6/10/2003 11:47:29 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Re: "Bush lied." I have already posted that I see that the argument is split along the fault line of those who desperately, madly want a Democrat to be elected president, and those who don't. I hope that I won't have to read umpteen gazillion posts about "Bush lied" until 2005, and if I do, I'll probably give up this thread, but for the nonce, my prediction is that if WMD don't turn up reasonably soon, Tenet (remember, he's a Clinton holdover) is taking the fall and Bush will steamroller on. I think you read it here first but until SI quits freezing up, would rather peel my skin off than wait to read all the posts. Which, by the way, is one reason that "Bush lied" is getting on my nerves, although not the only one.