SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (157895)6/16/2003 7:18:45 PM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
<<i agree with rd that the total bill ought to be smaller - AND THAT'S HOW YOU REDUCE EVERYONE'S TAXES.>> I agree fully. But for the government costs that are incurred, you can p;ay now, or pass the costs onto future generations. There is nothing inherently more "fair" about shirking financial responsibility for today's bills and passing them on to the next generation.



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (157895)6/26/2003 4:19:34 PM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
<<Had President Bush (news - web sites)'s latest tax cuts been in effect in 2000, the average tax bill for the top 400 would have been about $30.4 million a savings of $8.3 million, or more than a fifth, according to an analysis of the I.R.S. data by The New York Times. That would have resulted in an average tax rate of 17.5 percent. >>

story.news.yahoo.com


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News