Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Machaon who wrote (416485)	6/18/2003 10:02:25 PM
From: Skywatcher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

He didn't have them: Ex-CIA director says administration stretched facts on Iraq By John Diamond USA TODAY Wed Jun 18, 7:28 AM ET story.news.yahoo.com. WASHINGTON -- Former CIA (news - web sites) director Stansfield Turner accused the Bush administration Tuesday of ''overstretching the facts'' about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction in making its case for invading that country. Turner's broadside adds the retired admiral's name to a list of former intelligence professionals concerned that the CIA and its intelligence reports were manipulated to justify the war. Since Baghdad fell April 9, U.S. forces have been unable to find chemical and biological weapons the White House said were in Iraq (news - web sites). Turner, who headed the CIA under President Carter, paused for a long moment when asked by reporters whether current CIA Director George Tenet should resign. ''That's a tough one,'' Turner said. The problem did not appear to lie with the CIA, he said, but Tenet should consider resigning if he lost the confidence of President Bush (news - web sites) or the American people. A CIA spokesman declined to comment. Turner suggested Tenet should tread cautiously because CIA directors ''can be made the fall guy'' by administrations when policy judgments based on intelligence go wrong. Turner said, ''There is no question in my mind (policymakers) distorted the situation, either because they had bad intelligence or because they misinterpreted it.'' Public criticism of an administration's handling of intelligence is rare from former CIA directors, who typically give the benefit of the doubt to those with full access to classified information. President Bush has given no indication he is having second thoughts about his decision to invade Iraq. ''We made it clear to the dictator of Iraq that he must disarm,'' Bush said in a speech Tuesday at Northern Virginia Community College in Annandale. ''He chose not to do so, so we disarmed him. And I know there's a lot of revisionist history now going on, but one thing is certain. He is no longer a threat to the free world.'' Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) was known to have chemical and biological weapons in the early and mid-1990s. Late last year, Iraq claimed to have none left, though it offered no proof of having disposed of them. At the White House, spokesman Ari Fleischer (news - web sites) called it ''fanciful'' and ''a fit of imagination'' to believe that Saddam would have destroyed his arsenal but neglected to tell the world. Seeking to counter partisan criticism about the intelligence used to justify war, Fleischer said Democrats, including President Clinton (news - web sites), flatly asserted that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction in the late 1990s. ''The president has every confidence in the intelligence and that weapons will be found,'' Fleischer said. ''The president has full faith in Director Tenet.'' British Prime Minister Tony Blair (news - web sites) has been battling similar criticism about alleged misuse of intelligence. Robin Cook, who resigned from Blair's Cabinet on the eve of the U.S.-British invasion of Iraq, said Tuesday that searchers in Iraq had found no sign either of equipment or a workforce for making weapons of mass destruction. ''It is inconceivable that both could have been kept concealed for the two months we have been in occupation of Iraq,'' Cook told a parliamentary inquiry into Iraq intelligence matters. Turner's comments come a month after a group of retired U.S. intelligence officers wrote President Bush to ''express deep concern'' over alleged misuse of intelligence to justify the war. CC

To: Machaon who wrote (416485)	6/18/2003 10:34:41 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Is that the best answer you can give???? LOL.... You have all the other answers plus some that don't even have questions but you can't speculate as to why Saddam didn't use his nasty weapons... Bush said he issued orders to his troops to use them and there are reports that they could be deployed in 45 minutes..... Is there anywhere in your mind the possibility that he really didn't have any. Where are the chem suits for his troops.....we found about 300.....