Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: orkrious who wrote (12804)	6/19/2003 9:02:25 PM
From: loantech	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39344

John Doody thought greenstone, alta gold, williams resources and crown resources among others were worth a lot too. <NG>!!!!!!!!! He picked far more losers than winners. He never liked battle mountain, homestake or hecla some of my biggest winners when I ran from him as fast as I could with the remaining capital I had left. tom

To: orkrious who wrote (12804)	6/19/2003 9:06:30 PM
From: Proud Deplorable	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39344

WHAT ? What kind of idiot is saying that CAU is worth $34.00 ? It's now 1.59 and gold is at 360.00 Oh...another legal play ?

To: orkrious who wrote (12804)	6/19/2003 9:23:56 PM
From: que seria	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 39344

That makes the odds about right after adding some time value of money--say, 10-1? I mean, we're talking Montana, where Californians go when Lotusland is too commercial and not Green enough for them. I envision residents thinking they derive scant benefit from a gold mine and wanting to "just say no" to the environmental blot they think it would be (history on their side here). I envision courts agreeing. I'd sooner buy an explorer with only offshore Fla. or Cal. oil & gas leases than bet on a judicial resurrection of a mine over the voice of the Cal. or Mont. populace. At least we need natural gas. Gold is optional, and from the government's standpoint, best left in the ground. The gamble is no worse than I regularly undertake with the juniors I buy, but my research is more fun when I'm betting on geologists than judges. --No offense meant to you, Ork; thanks for putting that out to consider.