SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mahatmabenfoo who wrote (4745)6/24/2003 1:45:27 AM
From: Anthony@Pacific  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
yes you are right..im just as public and powerful as Merryl Lynch and Goldman Sachs.........

agreed?



To: Mahatmabenfoo who wrote (4745)6/24/2003 10:06:23 AM
From: SalemsHex  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
The issue here is not that you CAN'T create an unflattering (or otherwise) painting of a person...any person, its that you CAN'T profit from it w/o the persons (who you've painted) permission.



To: Mahatmabenfoo who wrote (4745)6/24/2003 6:22:08 PM
From: Janice Shell  Respond to of 12465
 
Taken literally, under your view you couldn't take a picture of people on a public street, and sell the picture -- let alone copies of it.

Not really to the point, but in Italy you can't, for example, take pictures (still or video) of a group of people studying in a library, unless you get all of them to sign waivers.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News