Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CYBERKEN who wrote (419804)	6/28/2003 1:44:47 AM
From: Kevin Rose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Kenny isn't too far off on one point. Although California is seen as staunchly liberal, it is actually deeply divided. San Diego and parts of the south, as well as the valley, are very conservative. The Bay Area and parts of LA are very liberal. So, there is a long distance between the poles, but CA can vote both ways. However, in the current environment, I doubt that Bush has much chance here in 2004.

To: CYBERKEN who wrote (419804)	6/28/2003 1:46:59 AM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Estrada and Reagan are irrelevant. Who brain-washed you to make that statement? Bill Schneider on CNN said Estrada's non-nomination had no discernible effect on Hispanic voters. Besides, the guy is a midget with a speech impediment and race isn't everything. Most Hispanics I know don't trust the GOP and never will. Reagan is very old hat. California is now the most heavily democratic state outside New England. Only a GOP moderate environmentalist would have a chance getting elected statewide. GW Bush is a right-wing extremist, not a moderate-conservative like his Dad. And most people in California know who ripped them off during the energy crisis. Bush is persona non grata around here and will remain so. 38% in California, no more. And those are just the Bushie diehards.