Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (103284)	6/28/2003 2:00:04 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Thought it was interesting as Ingraham is conservative, and I don't think anyone can say Pollack is. Oh, I agree, but Pollack has a new problem. He was one of the foremost arguing that, as I recall, Saddam had reconstituted his supply and was prepared to use them against invading US troops. That looks increasingly unlikely. So, I will be a bit more skeptical of his claims over the next few months. I will need to see exactly what he says, how he hedges, if he does, and how he deals with, at least the present, absence of any serious threat of wmds before the war.