To: Kevin Rose who wrote (420120 ) 6/29/2003 11:30:49 AM From: Thomas A Watson Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667 kevie, thanks for another example of your stupidity. I'll just take your idiotic micro analysis and show you complete stupidity. Ms Coulter: That same year, CNN's Margaret Carlson remarked that when her neighbors experienced temperate weather at Christmas, global warming was the word on everyone's lips. Adding to the world's supply of hot air, she said global warming was the big sleeper issue. Kevie the dumb <Hmm, no facts there, just a jab at CNN> Dear kevie the dumb. That sentence is a setup of an idea of a liberal that some local weather event is some indication of global warming being real. Using the logic of Margaret Carlson one can look at other events. Kevie is reporting what Margaret Carlson said a jab at CNN or anyone. In fact imitation is flattery and Ms Coulter will now use Margaret Carlson logic in assessing local weather facts and makes a counter argument. Ms Coulter: Well, this year, Washington, D.C., had the coldest February in a quarter-century. What are the scientific conclusions of Ms. Carlson's neighbors now? In a single day in February, New York got its fourth-deepest snowfall since 1869. Baltimore got more snow in February than in any other month in recorded history. I wish there were global warming.kevie the dumb: <Coulter obviously does not understand macro issues. Just because it is cold one day in New York, does not mean there is no global warming. Again, not a single fact that is relevant to the discussion.> poor dumb kevie, the two ideas go together. The facts of the first quote are the using a single observation a kevie rose idiot mind has no understanding of climate over time was opining about how global warming was the big sleeper issue. In the second quote Ms Coulter goes on to use a similar set of local weather circumstance to ridicule the logic of Margaret Carlson. ROTFLOL... what is hilarious is that you read both ideas presented and did not see the ridicule and instead completely missed the simple idea of Ms Coulter. You make fun of Ms Coulter becuase you are to stupid to see logic and connections. And you make the observation that Ms Coulter cannot connect dots using the exact idea that Ms Coulter presented. And you were to stupid to see it. ROTFLOL.... Your entire analysis of the article is shows no ability to process ideas that are expressed in anything longer than a one line sound bite. LOL.... This get linked idiots.mine.nu