Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (421208)	7/1/2003 12:51:24 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769669

Of course with the acceptance of homosexuality, the basis for proscribing discussions of homosexuality from the “approved curriculum” evaporates. And that means the basis for proscribing polygamy, homosexual polygamy and bestiality also evaporates. There is only one sexual scheme that is worthy of the “approved curriculum” and that is heterosexuality – because heterosexuality is us – all of us. Claims that the status of the redundant sex is reduced “too far” are highly subjective because “status” is never judged objectively. Some women may consider it a privilege, a high honor, to serve their husbands in a polygamous relationship. You are not naturally authoritative enough to deny them the right to live as they please. They have a right to enjoy polygamy. They really do. They have no right to force affirmation of polygamy at all. Society ultimately may reject polygamy for one reason, the same reason it may reject homosexuality: it has no integrity with human identity.