SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (421608)7/2/2003 8:37:11 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
The problem is that there is no inferential force to your argument, it all depends on poetic slight of hand. Having bipolarity "in our genes" does not make us essentially heterosexual, because heterosexuality and homosexuality are psychological and behavioral dispositions, and, from that standpoint, some people are obviously homosexual from a very early age, if not birth. Not only is there no genetic determination involved, but for most homosexuals there is no free will involved, that is, they are willy- nilly attracted to men rather than women, as a given. As far as they can discern, it is their own individual nature, just as some people are athletic, some are musical, or as some enjoy adventure and others study........



To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (421608)7/2/2003 8:59:37 AM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
You've defined your base rule. How can you prove your inductive clause NEVER produces a homosexual?



To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (421608)7/2/2003 10:29:48 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
All truth is symmetrical and recursive. One often has to think and think and think to see it. And when one does one wonders why such simplicity was not obvious all along.