Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (103920)	7/2/2003 11:16:33 PM
From: Jacob Snyder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Then the solution is a constitutional amendment, making sitting Presidents immune to civil suits. But the solution should not be, to let a sitting President get away with something that would get anyone else convicted of a felony, imprisoned, and lose their job. If it's the law, whether you thinks it's fair or not, the President should follow it. If you think a President should be allowed to break laws he finds inconvenient or embarrassing or time-consuming, then you think he should be above the law.