Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Attack Iraq? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (6868)	7/4/2003 11:00:46 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8683

1. WMD will be found. Enough evidence has alreayd been found to indicate that Saddam was still trying to acquire and use them. What evidence? two rusty trailers? Give me a break! 2. The Bush Administration NEVER indicated a direct link between Al Quaeda and Iraq. Evidence of Iraq's participation in terror is OVERWHELMING. According to Gallup, 25% of Americans believe that Al Qaeda and Saddam are working together. This bull has been repeated over and over. Even GZ has mention of it in his original post. There is no evidence of it. Support of terrorists comes mainly from Saudi Arabia. Not Iraq. Stick to the facts. 3.The UN rendered itself irrelevant by failing to hold Iraq to account.... Bush rendered the UN irrelevant by attacking Iraq unilateraly. All the members of the UN were concerned about Iraq. They did not buy the urgent message of Bush as they knew it was a pack of lies. The facts now bear this out. No WMD found. Where is your evidence? You have none. Orca