Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Attack Iraq? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (6872)	7/5/2003 9:44:06 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 8683

You should stick to the facts yourself. 1. Evidence of and/or possesion of prohibited weapons: Al Samouds. Chemical warheads. chem suits atropine injectors CE residue in the Tigris Mobile bio labs. 2. The American public can believe what it likes and the American public is more than likely correct....BUT no one in the Bush Administration has ever made a claim of a link with Al Queda.... 3. The evidence that Saddam had no intention of disarming and abiding by the accords ending the Gulf War was overwhelming. 1441 drove the point home. Bush was the only one with the spine to act before a potential threat became another reality like 9/11. 4Where is your evidence? You have none. See #1 above. You continued repetition of any obviously inaccurate statement leads me to the inescapable conclusion that you are just another Bush hating moron unworthy of any substantive reply.