Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (6738)	7/4/2003 8:37:07 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7720

they worry more about their legacies than sucking up to passive voters and incessant media attention. Per person, I suspect they get a lot more media attention than legislators. True, they're not on the Sunday morning TV shows, but when's the last time the legislature got on the covers of both Time and Newsweek for a bill they passed? And when has there been the degree of speculation over a prospective legislative act that there is over the suspicion that within a few years the SC is going to declare that laws dictating opposite sexes only in marriage also violates the constitution? And it's their legacies I'm concerned about. No justice ever got admired for sticking to the Constitution. The justices who have legacies are those who were highly activist -- Marshall, Holmes, Warren, figures like that.