Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Attack Iraq? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (6930)	7/7/2003 6:21:12 PM
From: haqihana	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8683

Orca, We had to kill more than that to get Hitler, so what is so important about a mere 10,000. Those muslims breed like rats anyway. Saddam did have WMDs, and probably still does, but they are hidden away. Syria is a good bet as being the culprit in aiding Saddam. Some of his plans for mass destruction were side tracked, but that didn't change his ultimate intents. America must already be that beacon of freedom, and justice, because hordes from almost every country in the world are falling all over themselves trying to get into America, by hook or crook. All they need is a visitor's visa, and they will, illegally, melt in to the population, and in many cases, become criminals that our police forces have to catch, and punish. As if we didn't have enough of those jerks already. Sitting on our hands is not the answer. Pacifism is not the answer. Appeasment is not the answer. None of these, throughout history, has been successful. The only successful tactic, IMO, is total destruction, and total loss of enemy life. That's the only way to get the job done with certainty of success.