SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : CFZ E-Wiggle Workspace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ajtj99 who wrote (3663)7/7/2003 9:24:11 PM
From: The Freep  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41501
 
The hallmark of a C, I believe, is that you can't really tell it apart from a 3 up. It's strong and impulsive. So yeah, it should channel.

Though I'm not by any stretch suggesting we're in a C. But could it be? Yes.

the freep



To: ajtj99 who wrote (3663)7/7/2003 9:32:01 PM
From: the-phoenix  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41501
 
The most likely price targets for Wave 5 are: 61.8% of Wave 1, 100% of Wave 1, 161.8% of Wave 1, 161.8% of the length from the beginning of Wave 1 to end of Wave 3.

geocities.com

The .618 of Wave 1 was hit today at about 1276.

I'm not saying we top at 1300, but just pointing out alternatives to going to 1365 or whatever. I am loathe to get long at these levels, as by next week we could be headed down, which is where the real money can probably be made in the coming weeks.

Neither do I want to be short, yet.



To: ajtj99 who wrote (3663)7/8/2003 9:44:30 AM
From: JRI  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 41501
 
What about 1750-1757? You like that level for a pause?

Thing doesn't want to seem to want a breather..

Anyone know July/August max pain on QQQs?