SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TheBusDriver who wrote (13657)7/9/2003 8:10:40 AM
From: russwinter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39344
 
Forget about Myanmar, the story here is Turquoise Hill,and to some extent the China prospects. So far TH has an economic value of $15 billion, and the market cap is a mere 2% of that. Unlike some outfits, I have confidence in Friedland's ability to monetize this.

From the call;
newswire.ca

this new stuff is $100 rock, with underground cost estimated at $5/ton, and bulk mining at $2.10/t (Chinese cost are lower), so this is a gigantic money printing exercise when producing.

<As far as China replacing USA as economic powerhouse>

The point is that China is a huge market for minerals, regardless of the "powerhouse" pace. I don't read high political risk in Mongolia (TH isn't in China) at all.



To: TheBusDriver who wrote (13657)7/9/2003 10:18:15 AM
From: Claude Cormier  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 39344
 
Wayne,

The only reason I can give you is that Mongolia is likely to make IVN like Sudbury Ontario made Inco and Falco and Grasberg made Freeport.

So a decision to invest in IVN is a decision to believe in the future of Mongolia and China.