Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (104439)	7/9/2003 5:16:59 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

The Anglosphere and Economic Freedom Phil Bradley asks us to spot the common thread here The Cato institute has just released its annual Economic Freedom of the World Report and interesting reading it makes. The top 10 rankings of economic freedom - 1. being the most free - are as follows: 1. Hong Kong 2. Singapore 3. United States 4. New Zealand 5. United Kingdom 6. Canada 7. Switzerland 8. Ireland 9. Australia 10. Netherlands The report itself analyses how over the long term differences in economic freedom results in large differences in economic growth and prosperity. If you are interested in the details you can read the report. What struck me is that every significant anglophone country makes the top ten and only a single continental EU country (Holland) sneaks in at last place. The list is rounded out by Britain's last colony of any size (Hong Kong), another ex-british colony that has 100% anglophone middle class (Singapore), and the last continental EU hold-out (Switzerland). France comes far down the list at number 44, Italy and German do a little better, ranked at 35th and 20th respectively. Most people think of the Anglosphere in terms of political alignment in world affairs. The Cato report identifies something more important, which is a common understanding of how economic freedoms are integral to society, our economic well-being and personal liberty. Those in continental Europe who wonder why Britain is so sceptical of the EU and its attempts to 'harmonize', have only to read this report to see that harmonization would unavoidably result in the erosion of freedoms in Britain. Phil Bradley samizdata.net

To: maceng2 who wrote (104439)	7/10/2003 8:48:37 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

MP warns Blair could be forced to quit over weapons in Iraq claim dailyrecord.co.uk [Crisis meeting also mentioned by the telegraph etc, you have to register to get the story though.. pb] Ian Smith TONY Blair will be forced to resign unless weapons of mass destruction are found in Iraq, a Scots MP claimed last night. Labour's Brian Donohoe, usually a Blair loyalist, broke ranks to warn the PM he could be ousted over the fallout from the Iraq war. Donohoe's remarks came as fresh doubts were raised over whether WMD would ever be found in Iraq. Blair took the country to war claiming Saddam Hussein had chemical, biological and possibly even nuclear weapons. Donohoe, MP for Cunninghame South, said yesterday that if no weapons were found: "I do believe the position of the Prime Minister in these circumstances is untenable and that he would have to resign." Donohoe is furious that he was persuaded, against his original instincts, to back the war in a Commons vote because of Blair's claim that Saddam had WMD which posed a massive threat. He said: "The only thing that convinced me, and convinced many others, was the fact that we were going to war because of the immediate threat of Saddam by utilising weapons of mass destruction." He said that if no WMD were found then there was "no legitimate reason for us to go to war". Earlier this week, Blair subtly changed his position on WMD, saying he was sure "evidence" of weapons would be found, rather than his previous assertion that the weapons themselves would be uncovered. Donohoe said this wouldn't be enough and that only a substantial find of WMD would be enough to save Blair. Downing Street yesterday reacted to increasing speculation that ministers had given up hope of finding WMD, by insisting Blair was still confident "concrete evidence" would be uncovered. Blair's official spokesman said: "The Prime Minister believes and is absolutely confident that we will find material that, had Hans Blix found it, would have justified him going back to the security council and having a further UN resolution issued. "The Prime Minister is also absolutely confident that we will find evidence not only of WMD programmes, but concrete evidence of the product of those programmes as well." But former foreign secretary Robin Cook also warned that only the discovery of actual weapons of mass destruction in Iraq would vindicate Blair's decision to go to war. He said: "They said, quite explicitly, that there were weapons, indeed famously, they said there were weapons that would be ready within 45 minutes. "They also said that Saddam had rebuilt the factories to make more chemical weapons. To establish that that is correct, you do have to produce the weapons." The row between Downing Street and the BBC over its reports that pre- war intelligence dossiers were "sexed-up" also took a new twist yesterday. The foreign affairs committee announced it was reopening its investigation into the use of intelligence so it could call a Ministry of Defence WMD expert, David Kelly, who has been accused of being the BBC source. The BBC has denied he is the source, claiming it was a senior member of the intelligence services