Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (21780)	7/9/2003 11:55:39 PM
From: Karen Lawrence	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 89467

Row over weapons allegations threatens to turn the Iraq conflict into liability for Bush (WE CAN ONLY hope) By Rupert Cornwell in Washington 10 July 2003 news.independent.co.uk The row over Saddam Hussein's alleged weapons of mass destruction has been slow to reach America, but it is starting to become as much of a headache for President George Bush as it is for Tony Blair. The catalyst was the White House's acknowledgement, slipped out late on Monday as the President was leaving for Africa, that Mr Bush should not have included the discredited intelligence claims about uranium from Niger in his State of the Union address. That admission came after confirmation that the CIA itself had reported to the White House in March 2002 that the documents purporting to chronicle Iraq's deal with Niger were almost certainly fakes. The long-cowed Democrats are finally pitching in. "The whole world knew this was a fraud," Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, the senior Democrat on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, said of the documents. He demanded a full investigation into how the allegations found their way into the State of the Union speech on 28 January 2003. The Bush administration's response yesterday was to brush the matter off, or change the subject. Questioned in South Africa on the fiasco, Mr Bush said merely that he was sure the US had "done the right thing" in toppling Saddam. Ari Fleischer, the White House spokesman, said the mistake was just "one single sentence" in the January address. But the Democratic candidates vying for Mr Bush's job are also savaging his administration, ensuring that the controversy over Iraq and its unsubstantiated weapons programmes will stay on the boil. The issue has helped to propel Howard Dean, former governor of Vermont and outspoken critic of the war, to the front of the Democratic pack. The demands for an investigation will give new impetus to inquiries by at least three committees on Capitol Hill. The House and Senate intelligence committees are preparing hearings, while the Senate's Armed Services Committee is asking pointed questions. In addition the House Appropriations Committee, which has just approved a $369bn Pentagon budget for 2004, is also considering its own inquiry into whether Donald Rumsfeld's staff distorted pre-war intelligence on Iraq. Two thirds of Americans still believe it was right to invade. But rising troop casualties and a continuing failure to find illegal weapons could combine to turn Iraq into a liability for the President. 9 July 2003 20:53 Search this site: Printable Story