SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Raymond Duray who wrote (21917)7/10/2003 10:57:38 AM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
I agree with Arianna Huffington (and I'm think you as well) that polls are bunk.

I don't think polls are bunk. They reflect "opinion" as it exists. You just have to be careful how you interpret the opinion and watch for poll organizations that manipulate.

If I see a poll that has a plus or minus 5%, rather than the standard plus or minus 2-3%, that's a flag. It's not that hard to get 2-3%. If I see a mix of current figures against historic figures, I know what they are doing.

Poll: If half of the American people believe that Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11, that's valuable information! You do have to ask the question, how did they come to believe that? I think the only reasonable explanation is that every time Bush [the Administration] talked about Iraq ---- 9/11 and terrorists were in the same paragraph. He never said Iraq was behind 9/11, he just put all the words in the same paragraph. The next question is was the choice of words and the expected outcome intentional?

Poll: A majority of people support "affirmative action"; a majority of people oppose "quotas". If you're a conservative, you need to know that. That way you know to refer to every "affirmative action" program as a "quota".

Silimar with statistics. Statistics is simple number crunching. It's not bad or good. But if I see someone being highly selective in which sampling years they pick or pick different year ranges in the same analysis, you can't bet they are data mining and doing what if's in their spreadsheet to see what looks good.

jttmab



To: Raymond Duray who wrote (21917)7/10/2003 11:07:18 AM
From: Susan  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 93284
 
Boy you read some of Greg Palast and it really makes you sick for this poor country. Brings to mind the old saying about absolute power corrupts absolutely.....
Well I didn't vote for him...



To: Raymond Duray who wrote (21917)7/10/2003 11:19:16 AM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
This is absolutely great...I doubt that it will be available for a long time...

Go to google.com

Type in "weapons of mass destruction"

Include the quotes and then click on I'm Feeling Lucky

At first it will look like the standard error screen, but read it.

jttmab