SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (425432)7/10/2003 7:24:03 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769670
 
Er, wouldn't we actually have to formally ask NATO or the UN before they would send troops?

(And we haven't asked.... :)

USA Today had an article about it this morning.

Seems we were counting on countries like Pakistan and India and Portugal (and Turkey) to send most of the 'replacement troops' so we wouldn't have to formally ask NATO or the UN to send troops... but now they (at least the first three) are saying they can only send troops if they are to serve under a UN or NATO command... not US command.

Also they want us, of course, to pick up the tab for their troop deployments.



To: American Spirit who wrote (425432)7/11/2003 9:20:18 AM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
LOL!

"Peacekeepers" are as irrelevant as the UN at this point. And Bush didn't lie so there's nothing to forgive....