SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (84638)7/13/2003 3:13:13 PM
From: SEC-ond-chance  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
Dirks sent out 3 buy reports on NWLL

Here is what Ted Melcher(SEC) from Marketdigest Online (formerly SGA Goldstar ) has to say about Dirks and New Tel

Here is earlier e-mail from MDO: (Thanks, Ted!)

Pulpwoody (Again substituted for real name):

Yes. that will be okay to post my NWLL commentary on Raging Bull......but
tell those people to subscribe. We continue to pick winners lately in stocks
and options..... as you know..... CSCO puts, shorts on many of the high
fliers, IMCL, BLDP, TARO, ADVP, DURA, SHFL.....I'm babbling....you know, as
you subscribe. The people over on the Raging Bull all want something for
nothing.

On NWLL, or any stock for that matter, MDO is in the pocket of no one. We
look at each situation objectively. I'm currently long NWLL myself. I know,
as all MDO subscribers should know, that NWLL is a highly speculative
situation. I originally recommended the stock as it was given to me as an
idea from a stock broker subscriber with (brokerage company omitted). I've tried to
continue to support the stock because I know this guy has literally hung
himself. He has a big position with an average cost around $22. I know there
are also other subscribers - one in particular - who have big positions at
average prices in the $20's......so for them too, I'm trying to hang in
there with the stock. HOWEVER.....ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!

The delays have been too long. Either announce that the deal is done or
announce that it's not done! This crap of company officials telling
shareholders before the announcement that the deal will be announced by a
certain date is not good at all. I also reiterated to my stock broker
subscriber from the very beginning that I did not like the fact that Ray
Dirks was involved. Dirks doesn't make a recommendation unless his pockets
are greased in a big way....so there's no way he can look at the situation
objectively. If you'll recall, in one of my commentaries I pointed out that
many of Dirks' deals were at or near their 52-week lows and we can now add
NWLL to the list. So post my commentary on Raging Bull. Maybe it will wake
some of the idiots up! Unless something transpires within the next two
weeks, I'd be a seller of the stock. There's too many other plays out there
where you can make money and given that the technicals on NWLL are in the
toilet, this will have to be one #### of an announcement to get this stock
above it's bearish resistance line. Bottom line, the stock may be good for a
trade and that's it. Hopefully, NWLL officials prove me wrong.

MDO

ragingbull.altavista.com



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (84638)7/14/2003 9:23:43 PM
From: SEC-ond-chance  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 122087
 
If I only could have had a 4th Dirks buy report and at least one more MarketDigestOnline Whisper Stock profile by Ted Melcher....I just know I could have turned the company around!!

New Tel was solvent: ex-boss Pete Malone

By Fran Spencer

FORMER New Tel chief executive Peter Malone yesterday lashed out at the liquidator of the failed telco with an angry denial that the company had traded while insolvent.

Mr Malone, who the liquidator plans to pursue through the courts, also claims New Tel "totally, absolutely, certainly" would have traded its way out of difficulty if left under his stewardship.

Speaking to WestBusiness last night, Mr Malone said any attempt by liquidator Phil Carter of PricewaterhouseCoopers to sue him or the other directors of the company would be defended "vigorously".

"Obviously from our point of view we had separate legal and accounting advice, and it never said there was any issue of insolvent trading," he said.

"We would have a totally opposing view to what this guy Carter is saying . . . from our point of view we had separate advice all the way through and what was confirmed to us was that we were solvent all the way through.

"I think the statements that were made to convince people to go for liquidation were very much 'if you give us the liquidation mandate, we can go after the names here' (and) that persuaded AAPT, Telstra and Optus to break with the rank and file and vote for liquidation, but I think that's completely contradictory to the internal advice."

Mr Carter took control of New Tel on December 10 after its biggest creditor, Optus, called in the administrators. He has said repeatedly that he believes the Perth-based company, which had estimated debts of $50 million, might have been insolvent for up to a year before his appointment and has flagged plans to pursue its directors through the courts.

But according to Mr Malone, the appointment of Mr Carter killed off any hopes of the company regaining its feet.

"I think people have got to look at the facts surrounding the appointment of the administrator and the situation that came about . . . at the end of the day I think that we had a company with a plan and it was going forward, and (then) we had an administrator appointed that stymied all our actions - when that happens you're out in the cold, you've got no control of the company any more," he said.

And he claims he would have been able to turn the company's fortunes around if left in charge.

"Just read between the lines . . . if (the money from the sale of the fixed line business), the share that was due to New Tel, had come to New Tel there wouldn't be a shortfall," he said.

"Creditors would have been paid off in full."

Mr Malone said plans to buy back some of New Tel's assets and resurrect the company had fallen through, and he had now turned his back on the telco industry.

The former chief is already embroiled in a Supreme Court battle with the Australian Taxation Office, which has targeted both his personal bank account and that of former New Tel chairman Harry Sorensen in an attempt to recover more than $570,000 in unpaid tax.

Mr Malone refused to comment on the tax action, but said the matter was "under negotiation".



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (84638)7/16/2003 8:22:54 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
EVER HEAR THE ONE ABOUT RICHARD GEIST'S OFFSHORE MAELSTROM ?
==================================================

The other new director, Richard Geist, is described in various press releases as the president of the Institute of Psychology of Investing. But he is also a penny-stock promoter who publishes a newsletter entitled "Richard Geist's Strategic Investing."

It would be interesting to hear what the above-mentioned individuals have to say about all this. But Geist, Bendall and Lauer all declined requests for interviews on the matter. At week's end Lauer's office faxed me a copy of a two-page letter he had distributed to his investors following our September story, dismissing the column as mere "negative press."
=================================

OFFSHORE MAELSTROM nypost.com

By CHRISTOPHER BYRON

January 13, 2003 --

WE'VE been pounding the table for quite a while now, arguing that the offshore hedge fund business is a $400 billion time bomb waiting to explode. This is a business in which nearly half a trillion dollars moves in and out of U.S. capital markets with almost no regulation or oversight, attracting exactly the sorts of people you wouldn't want your daughter to bring home for dinner.

Now, no less savvy a Wall Street operator than Ron "The Finagle King" Perelman has become entangled in the brambles of offshore finance. Evidence of his predicament surfaced just before Christmas in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing by a company in which Perelman and colleagues are calling the shots as controlling investors.

The company in question, which bears the name Nephros Inc., is a biotech startup in the field of kidney disease. The New York-based outfit is typical of many such biotech startups in that it's an itty-bitty operation with grand plans for the future. Best evidence: the company's microscopic revenues of less than $300,000 over its entire six years of life, as against cumulative losses of more than $13 million during the same period.

With numbers like those, it's usually just a matter of time before such a company turns hat in hand to Wall Street and the IPO market for the capital to stay in business. And since it's easier to sell stock in a company that already has some cash showing on the balance sheet, these IPOs are typically preceded by recapitalizations designed to prettify things up a bit with the financial equivalent of lipstick and rouge.

IT was under those circumstances, back in the summer of 2002, that King Finagle and his finaglettes began tarting up Nephros Inc. for an IPO. And in a decision they've all now clearly come to regret, they did so by inviting in some money from the world of offshore finance - in this case, from an offshore hedge fund group with a name that regular readers of this column may well recognize.

Back in September, we told you the story of Michael Lauer and his Lancer group of hedge funds, with its "Lancer Offshore Fund" as the group's centerpiece operation. In that story, Lauer claimed his Lancer Offshore Fund alone had "a billion bucks" under management, though we questioned whether the stocks in all the group's combined portfolios were worth much of anything.

A search of SEC records turned up dozens of illiquid, thinly traded and easily manipulated penny stocks in which various Lancer group funds had lately held shares. The majority of them proved to be worthless "pink sheet" stocks - the sub-basement of the over-the-counter market - with offering prices of fractions of a penny per share.

This was the reality that lurked behind Lauer's operation when he showed up on King Finagle's doorstep, offering to make an investment in Nephros.

And there were other facts that could also have been uncovered easily enough, had the Perelman group been curious regarding the sources of Lauer's money.

For starters, SEC filings show that at least seven of Lauer's investments involved penny-stock companies backed by a legendary Wall Street swindler and ex-con named Abraham Salaman. A search of recent news stories would have revealed that in March of 2000, Salaman was arrested, along with several organized crime figures in New York, and charged with a $60 million penny stock swindle.

NOR was Salaman the only shady fellow with whom Lauer was involved. One of the Lancer Fund holdings is a pink-sheets company called Neurocorp Inc., in which Salaman was a founding investor back in 1994. One of the early investors in Neurocorp, along with Salaman, was a money man named Jay Botchman, who bailed out by selling his stake to Lauer. Botchman himself was, in turn, a recent business partner of a man named John Peter Galanis, who by then was doing time in federal prison for a series of savings-and-loan swindles in the 1980s. Botchman also appears in court testimony as a financial backer of a mob-infested carpet cleaning company named ZZZZ Best Inc.

Botchman's name has now surfaced, once again, in connection with Lauer and the Lancer funds - this time as a result of his controlling 40.3 percent stake in a sub-prime lender named Credit Store Inc. Lauer and the Lancer group are the company's second-largest shareholders, with a collective 23.7 percent stake.

A late 1999 SEC filing shows the Galanis family was involved as well, at least for a time: An individual named Derek Galanis was listed as company president until early 2000, when his name simply disappeared from SEC filings. Forbes magazine subsequently identified Derek as John Peter Galanis's son. In October 2001, Derek Galanis and his brother Jason were arrested by federal agents and charged with involvement in an alleged drug smuggling ring out of Kosovo. Both have pleaded not guilty.

Want more? Then let's turn to something called Automotive Performance Group Inc. SEC filings show that, as of late 1998, the Lancer group was the company's second-largest shareholder. The company's largest shareholder - with a controlling 77.5 percent of the company's stock - was one Andrew L. Evans. An earlier and close friend of Microsoft Corp. co-founder Bill Gates, who is the godfather to three Evans children, Evans also turns out to be an ex-con who spent six months in prison in the mid-1980s for swindling a Seattle bank out of $500,000 on a loan application.

AND that's not all the Finagle King was unwittingly buying into. In February 2002, the Lancer Offshore Fund's two directors resigned for "business reasons," and were replaced by two new men. One replacement is a fellow named John W. Bendall Jr., who heads a penny-stock investment firm named Hermitage Capital Corp. Hermitage is a major investor in a variety of Lancer deals, including Automotive Performance, which hasn't traded in a year and is currently in the pink sheets at one cent per share. The other new director, Richard Geist, is described in various press releases as the president of the Institute of Psychology of Investing. But he is also a penny-stock promoter who publishes a newsletter entitled "Richard Geist's Strategic Investing."

It would be interesting to hear what the above-mentioned individuals have to say about all this. But Geist, Bendall and Lauer all declined requests for interviews on the matter. At week's end Lauer's office faxed me a copy of a two-page letter he had distributed to his investors following our September story, dismissing the column as mere "negative press."

THE King of All Finagles would doubtless like to hear some plain speaking on the matter as well. That's because scarcely had Lauer met with various of the King's finaglettes last August and agreed to a $3 million stock-and-warrants investment in Nephros Inc., than he ponied up only the first $1.5 million and promptly welshed on the other half. A top finaglette in the Sun King's court says the reason Lauer offered was that Lancer was being hit with redemptions and that he didn't have the money.

Hmm. A "billion bucks" fund that can't cut a check for a mere $1.5 million? Sounds rather finaglish to me - which is apparently how it struck His Highness as well. In a Nephros Inc. registration statement filed with the SEC on Dec. 23 is a plain English warning of what awaits any mortal so bold as to finagle the King: "If we are not able to resolve this matter in a manner that is satisfactory to us, then we intend to pursue vigorously all available legal remedies against Lancer Offshore, Inc."

Fair warning for the folks at the Lancer group, to be sure. But what about for everyone else? How many more such problems must develop before regulators realize that offshore hedge funds simply can no longer go unregulated?

To be granted access to the capital markets of America, these funds need to answer some basic questions - like who's behind them, what they're investing in, who's auditing them, and where one can go to inspect their financial accounts. Only when the disinfecting sunlight of full disclosure is turned on this industry will its odor begin to go away.

For more information and headlines on this company



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (84638)7/16/2003 9:47:54 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
Richard Geist's Strategic Investing re-iterates strong buy on Solv-Ex in wake of Dorfman's attempt to destroy company credibility.

In one of the more malicious and irresponsible cases of financial journalism witnessed in many years, Dan Dorfman used his CNBC bully pulpit in an extraordinary attempt to destroy Solv-Ex and its management's credibility. Citing an unnamed 'Wall Street Pro' he proclaimed that the SEC was investigating trading in SOLV's stock. He also said that Fahnestock & Co. analyst Fadel Gheit believed the company is a 'typical hype, pie-in-the-sky' story and that SOLV's stock is worth less than $5.
Dorfman was not without the facts on SOLV. He had in his possession copies of Strategic Investing's November 1995 recommendation on the Company and energy analyst Charlie Maxwell's letter to his clients stating that if all went well with Solv-Ex, the company could become the world's leading oil producing company by the year 2008.

Dorfman could also have had access to David Snow's detailed analysis of SOLV in which Solv-Ex's stock could be at $200 within two years and at $1000 within a decade. If Dorfman had bothered to inquire, he could have studied an independent technology consultant's report (Pace Consultants, Inc. Houston, Texas) on the positive viability of both SOLV's technology and their marketing plan. He could have discussed his concerns with the Company rather than telephoning them at lunch time shortly before the show when no one was available and then never following up. He also could have revealed that the so called expert analyst -- Fadel Gheit -- worked for a firm that allegedly has been shorting the stock and that the analyst had had no contact with the Company for two years, and to our knowledge has not issued a report on the Company.

None of the facts or projections we have made in our November or December issues has changed. The SEC has not contacted Solv-Ex, and any investigation of share manipulation would probably focus on the short sellers. Permits for a co-production plant to produce oil, and later, alumina from oil sands on the Company's Bitumount Lease in Alberta's Athabasca region were received on Dec. 12, 1995. A week later the Company received formal approval to proceed with construction and operation of a plant to process oil sands tailings for production of minerals and metals. Financing is imminent and will include a combination of 50% debt and 50% equity. The Company has access to 4 billion barrels of oil and is sitting on 10% of the world's alumina supply -- hardly a $5 per share company. Plant construction will be under way soon, and the potential for the alumina cell to revolutionize how and at what costs this mineral is produced remains extremely positive. A secondary offering with a major investment banking firm is likely in the near future. If Dorfman wanted to rationally question the rise in SOLV's stock price, which was probably motivated by anticipation of financing rather than a short squeeze, he could have legitimately questioned whether the technology would work in real life, and then checked to see that there had been outside verification of the technology as performed in the Company's pilot plant. It is certainly legitimate to debate the technology, but not if one failed to take the time to learn about it.

For whatever reason, Dorfman decided to side with the short sellers. Although we know that rumor and innuendo is Dorfman's trademark, the idea that his glib speculation and negative hype probably caused small investors to experience margin calls and potentially large losses of capital reminds us of some one who would yell fire in a crowded theater and then take pleasure when folks get trampled as they headed for the exits. The more important question in this scenario, however, is not Dorfman's motives or character or CNBC's rationale for supporting this three ring circus (all of which many have questioned). It is, rather, why do investors take seriously such bombastic and unsubstantiated rhetoric?

Solv-Ex has a lab-proven and independently verified technology, extremely honest and forthright management, and a workable business plan. The stock was pushed back to the mid $20 range -- our initial short term target for the stock -- from the mid $30 range. It is a strong buy at these levels, and once the financing is in place we look for the stock to begin moving toward the $50 range. Solv-Ex is a strong buy for aggressive investors.



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (84638)7/17/2003 12:42:56 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
Investor Therapy Dr. Richard Geist

randomhouse.com



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (84638)7/17/2003 1:10:26 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
SEC wins injunction on Wolfson's Olsen Payne broker

2003-07-17 13:03 ET - Street Wire

Also Street Wire (C-*TSX) TSX Venture Exchange

by Brent Mudry

Canada's most respected securities regulator has entered a permanent injunction against a Salt Lake City, Utah, broker charged in two civil cases of separate rings of American penny stock players who allegedly used Vancouver brokerages in manipulative stock frauds. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission announced Tuesday that Kevin Kirkpatrick, 42, was enjoined from future securities violations by Judge Tena Campbell of United States District Court for the District of Utah. While Canadian brokerages, especially those in Vancouver, were often used as conduits, there is no suggestion these brokerages or any of their officials had any idea anything was amiss.

The judge has not yet decided on fines and disgorgement, if any, for Mr. Kirkpatrick's role in the manipulation of Freedom Surf Inc. from July through November, 2000. The alleged penny stock rig job featured Allen Z. Wolfson, 55, a notable Salt Lake City promoter currently in jail in the New York Metropolitan Correctional Center in an unrelated case.

In this separate case, which involved criminal and SEC proceedings, Mr. Wolfson was convicted March 26 after a month-long trial of conspiracy, securities fraud and wire fraud offences arising from his scheme to manipulate six penny stocks from early 1999 through July, 2000, resulting in losses to the public of at least $7-million. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.) In this case, part of Operation Uptick, a massive FBI bust of Mafia-linked penny stock promoters, Mr. Wolfson bribed numerous U.S. brokers through offshore wires to a mobbed-up middleman, Michael Grecco, an associate of the Colombo organized crime family.

While Mr. Kirkpatrick was not involved in the Operation Uptick case, he was involved in a third U.S. penny stock case featuring offshore dealings through accounts on Howe Street, Vancouver's penny stock centre. Mr. Kirkpatrick was named a defendant in the SEC prosecution of Maid Aide Inc., for which he was fined a total of $200,000 earlier this month. A number of Maid Aide players were also charged criminally, led by Las Vegas lawyer Max C. Tanner, jailed for eight years. (Mr. Wolfson was not involved in the Maid Aide case.)

WOLFSON'S FREEDOM SURF PROMOTION

The SEC filed a civil action Sept. 30, 2002, in U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, charging Mr. Kirkpatrick, Mr. Wolfson, 11 other individuals and a Dallas-based brokerage with securities fraud in a scheme to manipulate shares of Freedom Surf from July through September of 2000. "The stock manipulation scheme perpetrated by Kirkpatrick and others appeared to shut down when SEC staff began investigating in November, 2000," stated the SEC on Tuesday.

The securities fraud complaint came six months after the SEC filed an accounting fraud action against the former president and former vice-president of Freedom Surf, since renamed Freestar Technologies, alleging they cooked the books by falsifying the company's financial statements.

In the securities fraud case, the defendants include Mr. Kirkpatrick, a broker at Olsen Payne, Mr. Wolfson, his son David Wolfson, 24, also of Salt Lake City, Mervyn Phelan Sr., 63, of Laguna Beach, Calif., his son Mervyn (Bo) Phelan Jr., 33, of Dana Point, Calif., disbarred attorney and convicted felon John W. Cruickhank Jr., 64, of Downey, Calif., trader Robert H. Pozner, 58, of Ridgewood, N.J., Dallas brokerage Salomon Grey Financial Corp., and three Texans: its president Kyle Rowe, 36, of Dallas, its chief executiver officer Angelo Paul Koupas, 34, of Frisco, and its head trader Christopher Roundtree, 25, of Little Elm. Also named were John Chapman, 61, of Salt Lake City, Craig H. Brown, 46, of Laguna Beach, and three of Allen Z. Wolfson's companies: Feng Shui Consultants Inc., formerly World Alliance Consulting Inc., A-Z Professional Consultants Retirement Trust Inc. and the AZW Irrevocable Trust.

"The SEC's complaint alleges that Phelan Sr. originated the scheme to manipulate Freedom Surf stock, and enlisted Allen Wolfson to carry it out. In July and August 2000, Phelan, his son, Phelan Jr., and Brown, transferred 345,000 Freedom Surf shares at no cost to Wolfson. Wolfson then deposited the shares in accounts he controlled at Olsen Payne. Then, Allen Wolfson and his son, David Wolfson, directed Kirkpatrick, a stock trader at Olsen Payne, to bid up the price of Freedom Surf by posting artificially high quotations for the stock;" states the SEC.

"Pozner, a trader at Glenn Michael Financial, bid up the stock price in concert with Kirkpatrick and on Allen Wolfson's instructions. Through these manipulative activities, Wolfson and the other defendants caused the Freedom Surf stock price to increase from $5 to $40 in approximately two months, before the stock was split 4 for 1 on October 11, 2000."

The SEC also claims Salomon Grey, Mr. Koupas and Mr. Rowe had a pre-existing arrangement with Mr. Phelan Sr. and Allen Wolfson to obtain free and deeply discounted blocks of Freedom Surf stock for retail sales to the public at manipulated prices. The complaint further alleges that the defendants shut down the manipulation after SEC staff began investigating in early November, 2000, and the stock collapsed to a low of 19 cents by the end of the year.

The SEC claims that Mr. Chapman, who works with Mr. Wolfson, had trading authority over five of six entities holding Canadian brokerage accounts that engaged in manipulative trading. Mr. Chapman and Mr. Wolfson both opted to assert their Fifth Amendment right against self incrimination and refused to testify in the SEC's investigation.

The SEC complaint notes that on July 21, 2000, Freedom Surf had its first price quotation, when market maker Mr. Kirkpatrick, on behalf of Olsen Payne, posted a $5 bid and a $10 ask price. Mr. Kirkpatrick was no slouch, according to the court filing. "Between July 21 and October 11, 2000, (the day of Freedom Surf's stock split), Kirkpatrick increased the bid price 53 times, to $40. During that time period, Olsen Payne posted or maintained the exclusive high bid on 51 of 58 trading days," states the SEC document.

"There was very little trading done during this time period. During the approximately two months when Freedom Surf stock went from $5 to $40 (July 21 through September 28, 2000), Kirkpatrick reported to NASDAQ only two transactions for a total of 200 shares, and, market-wide, there were only six transactions involving 850 shares, all of which were arranged trades."

The SEC claims that after the stock split on Oct. 11, 2000, Mr. Kirkpatrick posted a revised bid of $10 to reflect the split, and subsequently, between Oct. 17 and Oct. 23, Mr. Kirkpatrick raised the inside bid five times from $10.50 to $11.375. "During the entire period from July 21st to October 23rd, Kirkpatrick never reduced OLIE's (Olsen Payne's) bid quotation for Freedom Surf. Kirkpatrick had no client orders for his bid increases. He instead was steadily increasing the bid at the direction of Allen and David Wolfson," states the SEC complaint.

While Mr. Kirkpatrick was busy in Salt Lake City, fellow market maker Mr. Pozner was busy at Glenn Michael Financial Corp. in New Jersey, according to the SEC. "On July 21, 2000, Pozner, on behalf of Glenn Michael, matched Kirkpatrick's initial bid quotation of $5 just 2.5 minutes after Kirkpatrick's posting. Between July 21st and September 13, 2000, Pozner advanced Glenn Michael's bid sixteen times, from $5 to $35," states the SEC complaint.

"During this time, Pozner posted the exclusive inside bid nine times, and shared the inside bid with Kirkpatrick four more times. Even when he was not ahead of Kirkpatrick in bidding, Pozner was close behind, and in front of other market makers. Pozner posted the highest daily bid of any firm on seven days during this time period. Pozner had no client orders for his bid increases. He was instead increasing the bid at the direction of Wolfson."

The SEC claims that in moving the bid at Mr. Wolfson's direction, Mr. Kirkpatrick and Mr. Pozner knowingly and recklessly participated in and furthered the manipulation of Freedom Surf stock. Mr. Pozner, like Mr. Wolfson and Mr. Chapman, opted to plead the Fifth.

The SEC further claims that David Wolfson, Allen Wolfson, his office manager and executive assistant Bonniejean Tippetts, Mr. Kirkpatrick, Mr. Chapman and the senior Mr. Wolfson's three corporate defendants "effected manipulative, arranged public market trades among Wolfson-controlled accounts" between July 28, 2000, and Oct. 23, 2000, to inflate the stock price of Freedom Surf prior to a key block sale of 25,000 shares to retailer Salomon Grey.

This is the first time the Canadian accounts played a key role.

"Six accounts at Canadian broker-dealers generated all of the retail demand for Freedom Surf during the foregoing period: (1) East-West Trading Corporation at Union Securities, Ltd.; (2) East-West Trading at Canaccord Capital Corporation; (3) Karston Electronics at Canaccord; (4) Leeward Consulting Group LLC at Rampart Securities Inc.; (5) Consolidated Euro-Holdings at Credifinance; and (6) AZW Irrevocable Trust at Canaccord," states the SEC.

The regulator claims that Mr. Chapman, doing business as International Consulting, had trading authority over five of the six Canadian accounts. The SEC also claims that Mr. Chapman operates out of the same business address as Wolfson, and shares profits from trading in the Canadian accounts with him. (Ms. Tippetts is listed as trustee of the sixth account, AZW Irrevocable Trust.)

The SEC claims the Canadian accounts collectively purchased 12,950 shares of Freedom Surf from U.S. market makers in 10 transactions at increasing prices between July 28 and October 20, 2000. The regulator further claims that sell orders from the Wolfson-controlled accounts at Olsen Payne, near in time to the buy orders and in identical or nearly identical amounts, provided to the marketplace the stock that was used to fill the demand from the Canadian accounts.

According to the SEC, Mr. Wolfson's World Alliance and A-Z Retirement Trust accounts accounted for 100 per cent of the retail sales volume in Freedom Surf between July 28 and October 23, 2000, with Allen and David Wolfson calling in trades for the Olsen Payne accounts to Mr. Kirkpatrick during this period. The SEC claims these manipulative trades created actual and apparent activity in Freedom Surf stock, and caused the stock price to rise.

"In the spring of 2001, the defendants sold over 1.1 million shares of Freedom Surf stock in unregistered transactions from an escrow brokerage account controlled by Brown and Bo Phelan, and from the Chapman-controlled Canadian accounts," states the SEC.

The SEC claims the group continued trading through the Canadian accounts even after investigators appeared on the scene. (SEC investigators made surprise inspections of a number of the players on Nov. 30, 2000. The stock closed at $3.30 the day before, and plunged to a low of 19 cents in the following weeks after the manipulation was shut down.)

According to the SEC complaint, between August, 2000, and April, 2001, the Canadian accounts received more than 877,000 shares of Freedom Surf from sources directly linked to Mr. Phelan and Mr. Wolfson. The SEC claims that between March and June, 2001, the Canadian accounts sold over 196,000 of these shares into the market, even through no registration statement was in place and no exemptions were available.

Mr. Wolfson also faces criminal charges in the Freedom Surf case, in a New York grand jury indictment returned last December, but no trial date has yet been set.

TANNER'S MAID AIDE PROMOTION

So far, this has not been a good month for Mr. Kirkpatrick, the Olsen Payne broker who serviced Mr. Wolfson. On July 9, Judge Campbell of Utah ordered a permanent injunction against Mr. Kirkpatrick for his role in the Freedom Surf case. A week earlier, on July 2, Mr. Kirkpatrick was fined a total of $200,000 by a New York judge in the SEC's unrelated Maid Aide case.

Mr. Kirkpatrick was fined $92,000 for disgorgement, $33,200 for prejudgment interest and $75,000 for a civil penalty, in a summary judgment entered by Judge William Pauley, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York. (Judge Pauley is no stranger to Canadian penny stock shenanigans, having sentenced Vancouver broker Trevor Koenig of Union Securities this January in the WAMEX case and fined Toronto lawyer Simon Rosenfeld $2.8-million in the unrelated Synpro civil prosecution in March, 2001.)

Judge Pauley found that from March through December of 1998, Mr. Kirkpatrick and his co-defendants, notably Las Vegas securities lawyer Mr. Tanner, engaged in a scheme to manipulate shares of Maid Aide Inc. The scheme involved gaining control of a majority of Maid Aide's shares, creating artificial demand through boiler room operations and creating the appearance of legitimate trading through Mr. Kirkpatrick at Olsen Payne.

The Maid Aide case was probed by the SEC, the BCSC, the FBI, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, and NASD Regulation Inc., the regulatory arm of the National Association of Securities Dealers. U.S. authorities, through the criminal prosecution and the SEC's civil case, have imposed a total of $15.3-million in assorted fines in the Maid Aide case.

According to U.S. authorities, Maid Aide, purportedly a commercial and residential cleaning services company, was little more than a promotional shell fronted by the personal house cleaner of Mr. Tanner's co-defendant Dennis Evans, also of Las Vegas. Within weeks of Mr. Tanner and Mr. Evans incorporating Maid Aide in September, 1996, with the cleaning lady as their front, Mr. Tanner opened his Delta Financial account at Pacific International.

Mr. Tanner, the key player, was a former Internal Revenue Service attorney convicted for his offshore penny stock fraud, money laundering and income tax evasion who has now been sent to jail for eight years and fined $3.25-million in restitution in the criminal case. The SEC earlier gave Mr. Tanner a lifetime ban on serving as an officer or director of a public company, and later temporarily banned him from serving as a securities lawyer. The lawyer was convicted in November, 2001, of 37 counts related to securities fraud, including mail, wire and tax fraud, and money laundering, at the end of a five-week trial.

His money laundering conviction related to his dealings at Vancouver brokerage Pacific International Securities through his company Delta Financial Resources, based in the secretive offshore enclave of the Cayman Islands. The Tanner sentencing attracted national attention, and kicked off a lead business story in the New York Times on U.S. income tax prosecutions. "He funnelled the money through Canada to the Cayman Islands to evade all taxes," noted NYT income tax reporter David Cay Johnston. (Pacific International was not mentioned.)

WOLFSON SNARED IN OPERATION UPTICK

In the early stages of the Freedom Surf rig job, Mr. Wolfson had the misfortune of being snared in the FBI's Operation Uptick, the largest stock fraud case in U.S. history, an overall case involving 120 defendants, including at least 11 members and associates of five different organized crime families. Besides Mr. Wolfson, the most notable penny stock player in the June 14, 2000, arrest operation was Mafia-linked New York promoter Ed Durante, a star client of Mr. Koenig, who later helped put the broker, a top producer at Vancouver's Union Securities, behind bars. (Mr. Koenig was recently released.)

The FBI bust apparently did little to deter Mr. Wolfson. Five weeks after his arrest, his Olsen Payne broker Mr. Kirkpatrick posted the opening quotation for Freedom Surf, on July 21, 2000.

The FBI's Operation Uptick was co-ordinated with the SEC, which launched five civil enforcement actions against 63 individuals, including Mr. Wolfson. Operation Uptick led to the arrest of 120 defendants on June 14, 2000. Less than three years later, by late March, more than 95 of the 120 defendants had been convicted on charges arising from the Uptick case.

In the criminal case, Mr. Wolfson and six co-defendants were arrested. Although Mr. Wolfson unsuccessfully fought a trial, resulting in his conviction this March, his six associates all previously pled guilty. Mr. Grecco, the Colombo Mafia associate, was sentenced on Jan. 16, 2002 to 46 months in prison. Robert Balsamo was sentenced on November 16, 2001,to 30 months in prison. Konstantinos Dino Sonitis was sentenced on Jan. 25, 2002 to fives months in prison and five months of home confinement. Three others -- Vladimir Carvallo, Spiro Lazaretos and John M. Black Jr. -- either are in the midst of or await sentencing.

Mr. Wolfson, the ringleader, faces a maximum of 65 years in prison, with a recommended sentence of at least 10 years. His sentencing was set for July 11, but rescheduled to Sept. 12.

According to the evidence at trial, Mr. Wolfson was a stock promoter and consultant who operated through a series of front companies he controlled in Salt Lake City, including Cyberamerica Inc., Hudson Consulting Inc. and A-Z Professional Consulting. The jury reviewed evidence that Mr. Wolfson used these fronts to obtain large blocks of free-trading stock in each of six small-cap companies at little or no cost. Mr. Wolfson then paid secret bribes of as much as 65 per cent of the purchase price of the stocks to stock brokers in New York to motivate them to sell those stocks to their customers, according to the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York.

The six companies whose stocks were manipulated in 1999 and 2000 by Mr. Wolfson included ATR Industries, a home-cleaning service operating in Palm Beach, Fla., Learner's World Inc., which operated three day-care facilities in New York, Rollerball International, a Los Angeles manufacturer of in-line roller skates, Healthwatch Inc., a medical equipment company based in Atlanta, Ga., Hytk Industries Inc., a Kansas-based oil and gas company, and Power Exploration Inc., a Texas-based oil exploration company.

"Each of these companies were, at the time of Wolfson's stock manipulation scheme, consistently losing money. Several of them, including ATR Industries, Learner's World, and Hytk Industries, had little or no market for their stock prior to Wolfson's scheme to manipulate those securities, according to the government," states the U.S. Attorney's Office.

The jury heard evidence that Mr. Wolfson used a network of corrupt brokers in the New York metropolitan area to sell his stock in these companies to the public. To insulate himself, Mr. Wolfson used Mr. Grecco, the Mafia associate, as a middleman for the bribes. Mr. Wolfson paid Mr. Grecco bribes of up to 65 per cent, and Mr. Grecco passed on bribes of up to 40 per cent.

"The proof at trial established that Wolfson and Grecco used corrupt brokers at the following brokers dealers in the course of their scheme: Royal Hutton Securities, Bell Investment Group, Wolff Investment Group, Carribean Securities, Grady and Hatch & Co., Sharpe Capital, J. Banks Securities, and J.W. Barclay," states the U.S. Attorney's Office.

"The proof at trial showed that Wolfson's consulting company, Cyberamerica, employed a staff of cold-callers who actively sought out distressed public companies in need of financing. When such a target company was identified, Wolfson then offered consulting services to the company, taking payment in the company's stock. Wolfson then sold that stock into the demand generated by his manipulation scheme."

WOLFSON BEAT PREVIOUS CRIMINAL CASE

In 1996, four years before the Operation Uptick bust, Mr. Wolfson was snared in another major penny stock case, in which 45 promoters, brokers and associates were arrested after an extensive FBI undercover sting operation featuring two agents who helped arrange stock bribes. (Fugitive Vancouver promoter Daryl Buerge of Cam-Net Communications Network was also snared in this 1996 bust.)

Mr. Wolfson was charged with securities fraud, arising from his paying a 20-per-cent bribe to an undercover FBI agent, posing as a corrupt stock broker, to have the agent sell stock in a company named Alpha Solarco.

The jury in Mr. Wolfson's recent trial heard of his success in this previous criminal case. "Although that (1996) charge was dismissed in 1997, the evidence at trial (this year) included a recorded conversation between Wolfson and a co-operating witness working with the FBI in which Wolfson recounted his 1996 arrest for bribing the undercover agent, and explained that the 'only thing that got [him] off' that charge was his claim on tape that he 'only wanted to do what was legal,'" stated the U.S. Attorney's Office this spring.

THE VANCOUVER CONNECTION

An unrelated regulatory case also demonstrated Mr. Wolfson's fondness for Vancouver brokerages. In a Sept. 17, 1999, decision, NASD Regulation Inc., the enforcement arm of the National Association of Securities Dealers, fined broker Richard Dambakly $25,000 and banned him for one year in a case involving promissory notes related to Mr. Wolfson and his associate Mr. Chapman. The regulator alleged the broker participated in the issuance of four promissory notes by Trigon Corp. while he was associated with Paramount Investments International, a U.S. brokerage.

"One half of the (promissory note funds) transfers, totaling $240,000, originated with Canaccord Capital Corp., a Canadian broker-dealer; three originated with Union Securities, another Canadian broker-dealer; and one originated with Alan M. Berkun, who at the time was the owner of Marlowe & Company, a registered broker-dealer with the NASD," states the NASDR decision.

"Enforcement traced the source of the funds from the two Canadian broker-dealers and discovered that the funds originated from five accounts at those firms: East-West Trading Corporation ( East-West ), Karston Electronics Limited ( Karston ), Tamarisk Enterprises, Ltd. ( Tamarisk ), World Financial Corporation ( World Financial ), and Lexington Sales Corporation Limited ( Lexington ). Each of these firms is also a foreign corporation."

"Records obtained from the Vancouver Stock Exchange indicate that East-West and Karston are owned by Gordon Heywood, a resident of the United Kingdom. East-West lists its principal place of business as Nevis, West Indies, and Karston lists its principal place of business as Tortola, British Virgin Islands," states the NASDR.

"East-West had accounts at both Canaccord and Union Securities, and Mr. Chapman is designated as their representative on the account information forms. Mr. Chapman had authority to trade in Karston's account. The next two companies, Tamarisk and World Financial, have a number of common factors. Each has its principal place of business in the United Kingdom, and the Secretary of Tamarisk is the President of World Financial."

"Also, Alan Wolfson set up their accounts at Canaccord. Mr. Wolfson was a stock promoter who, in October 1996, was charged jointly with Mr. Chapman by the Securities and Exchange Commission in an administrative proceeding with violating the securities laws," states the NASDR decision.

These transactions all took place in the spring of 1996.

More than four years later, Mr. Wolfson had apparently not outworn his welcome on Howe Street. In late 2000 and early 2001, Mr. Wolfson used several of these previously red-flagged offshore companies, East-West and Karston, to allegedly perpetrate the Freedom Surf fraud, partly through accounts at the Vancouver brokerage firms.

As noted earlier, there is no suggestion that anyone at the the Vancouver or other Canadian brokerages had any idea anything was amiss.

bmudry@stockwatch.com



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (84638)7/17/2003 1:12:46 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
 
"The SEC also claims Salomon Grey, Mr. Koupas and Mr. Rowe had a pre-existing arrangement with Mr. Phelan Sr. and Allen Wolfson to obtain free and deeply discounted blocks of Freedom Surf stock for retail sales to the public at manipulated prices. The complaint further alleges that the defendants shut down the manipulation after SEC staff began investigating in early November, 2000, and the stock collapsed to a low of 19 cents by the end of the year."

sound familiar? Markow? Chinagate stocks?

The Revenge of the Investor!!



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (84638)7/17/2003 10:38:58 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
Salomon Greys head trader a Pacific Cortez Graduate which was charged by Sec.

File for: Data Current as of: 07/17/2003
CRD# 2956030
CHRISTOPHER JAMES ROUNDTREE


ALL CURRENT EMPLOYMENTS


This section provides all current employments (investment-related and non-investment related) as reported on the broker's Form U-4. It displays the name of the employing firm that employs this broker, the firm's CRD number (if applicable), the location of the office where the broker is employed, and the broker's start date.

To view information on NASD registered firms, you can click on the firm name hyperlink.

If the broker is currently employed with an investment adviser, the investment adviser's name and CRD number will display. However, additional information is not available on investment advisers through the Public Disclosure Program as they are not NASD registered firms.

If the broker is currently employed with a firm registered with any self-regulatory organization other than NASD (e.g., the NYSE), either the firm's name or "Other Business" will display as the Employing Firm. To obtain the firm's name when "Other Business" displays as the Employing Firm, please call the Public Disclosure Call Center Hotline number, 1-800-289-9999.

A Firm CRD Number will not display for employing firms that are not NASD registered firms. Information on these employing firms is not available through the Public Disclosure Program.


Employing Firm: SALOMON GREY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Firm CRD Number: 43413
Office of Employment
Address: 5430 LBJ FRWY
SUITE 1626
DALLAS, TX 75240

Start Date: 01/01/1999
End Date: to present

Other Business


No data in this category.

File for: Data Current as of: 07/17/2003
CRD# 2956030
CHRISTOPHER JAMES ROUNDTREE


PREVIOUS EMPLOYMENT


This section provides 10 years of an individual's employment history. If the individual is currently registered with NASD, employment history will be displayed for the previous 10 years. If the individual is not currently registered with NASD, employment history will be displayed for the 10 years prior to termination of the registration. The firm's CRD number, the office of employment address where the broker was employed, and the dates of employment will be displayed.

If the broker was previously employed with an investment adviser, the investment adviser's name and CRD number will display. However, additional information is not available on investment advisers through the Public Disclosure Program as they are not NASD registered firms.

If the broker was previously employed with a firm registered with any self-regulatory organization other than NASD (e.g., the NYSE), either the firm's name or "Other Business" will display as the Employing Firm. To obtain the firm's name when "Other Business" displays as the Employing Firm, please call the Public Disclosure Call Center Hotline number, 1-800-289-9999.

A Firm CRD Number will not display for employing firms that are not NASD registered firms. Information on these employing firms is not available through the Public Disclosure Program.



Employing Firm: PACIFIC CORTEZ SECURITIES INCORPORATED
Firm CRD Number:
Office of Employment
Address: DALLAS, TX
Start Date: 09/1997
End Date: 12/1998

Employing Firm: NETWORK STAFFING
Firm CRD Number:
Office of Employment
Address: DALLAS, TX
Start Date: 06/1997
End Date: 08/1997

Employing Firm: ADVANCED TELEMARKETING CORP
Firm CRD Number:
Office of Employment
Address: ADDISON, TX
Start Date: 01/1997
End Date: 06/1997

Employing Firm: COOPER'S INSTITUTE FOR AEROBIC RESEARCH
Firm CRD Number:
Office of Employment
Address: DALLAS, TX
Start Date: 06/1996
End Date: 07/1997

Employing Firm: PALM BEACH TAN
Firm CRD Number:
Office of Employment
Address: IRVING, TX
Start Date: 06/1996
End Date: 01/1997

Employing Firm: BROOKHAVEN COLLEGE
Firm CRD Number:
Office of Employment
Address: DALLAS, TX
Start Date: 01/1996
End Date: 08/1997

Employing Firm: BROOKHAVEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Firm CRD Number:
Office of Employment
Address: FARMERS BRANCH, TX
Start Date: 01/1996
End Date: 08/1997

Employing Firm: RICHLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Firm CRD Number:
Office of Employment
Address: DALLAS, TX
Start Date: 08/1995
End Date: 12/1995

Employing Firm: SUMMER VACATION
Firm CRD Number:
Office of Employment
Address: DALLAS, TX
Start Date: 06/1995
End Date: 08/1995

Employing Firm: MACAURTHER HIGH SCHOOL
Firm CRD Number:
Office of Employment
Address: IRVING, TX
Start Date: 08/1994
End Date: 05/1995

Employing Firm: SUMMER SCHOOL BERKNER HS
Firm CRD Number:
Office of Employment
Address: RICHARDSON, TX
Start Date: 06/1994
End Date: 08/1994

Employing Firm: NETWORK STAFFING
Firm CRD Number:
Office of Employment
Address: DALLAS, TX
Start Date: 01/1994
End Date: 06/1994

Employing Firm: CALLOWAY'S NURSERY
Firm CRD Number:
Office of Employment
Address: DALLAS, TX
Start Date: 05/1993
End Date: 03/1994

Employing Firm: LHHS
Firm CRD Number:
Office of Employment
Address: DALLAS, TX
Start Date: 08/1992
End Date: 06/1994