Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (1018)	7/13/2003 9:39:23 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Note: The Constituion was suspended on March 9th 1933, when President Franklin D. Roosecelt declared a state of national emergency and was granted a broad range of executive powers by congress to deal with the Great Depression under the War Powers Act of 1917. No president since then has ordered a proclamation ending the the national emergency. It still exists and the Constiution remains suspended, when national emergencies or wars are declared, allowing presidential executive powers to go unchecked. This also means that the president can declare a national emergency and order martial law at anytime! That's what that site says. No president since then has ordered a proclamation ending the the national emergency. I suppose that's correct. No president did it. Congress did it. It still exists and the Constiution remains suspended, when national emergencies or wars are declared, allowing presidential executive powers to go unchecked. And that, if it ever was correct, no longer is by that act of Congress. But would you care to produce the executive order "suspending the Constitution"? I know something of the history of that time and I know of know of no such action by FDR. It is doubtful such an order would be upheld by the USSC if challenged. The only emergency power granted the President in the Constitution is suspension of habeas corpus (which Lincoln did at the outbreak of the Civil War). Why hasn't Bush done it? Maybe it's not the plan to do it now. Maybe they are not ready. But it's there for when they are ready and whoever is President at the time can suspend the constitution and declare martial law. Let's see that EO.

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (1018)	7/14/2003 6:09:09 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

Sidney, Re: Why hasn't Bush done it? Maybe it's not the plan to do it now. The image of the frog in a pot of water comes to mind. After 9/11, the elites took things as far as they thought they could without creating a full-fledged revolt in the country against the "new world order" forces. They've been incrementally turning up the heat, so to speak, and building the military-industrial complex as well as laying the groundwork to eliminate civil liberties since the '70's. They understand incrementalism. We may get martial law next year, if the election results look too dubious for the Bush junta to continue its assault on the American republic and the rise of the police state/empire.