Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (1022)	7/13/2003 10:20:34 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Those are the powers that site CLAIMS the Prexy has. But we already found a glaring error in that conspiracy BS. Conspirators often don't read or think straight. Ray Deranged proves that. I want to see the actual wording to see what it ACTUALLY says. It's your claim. Back it up. Here's US Code: www4.law.cornell.edu Here's the CFR (where those EOs supposedly end up): access.gpo.gov You produce the text and I'll concede the point. But I see the actual text FIRST. And there's also this: www4.law.cornell.edu If FDR did issue an EO claiming the power to sujspend the Constitution, that cancelled his EO. So it no longer is effective. Another point: FDR had a lot of trouble with the USSC. A long running battle. He finally threatened to introduce an amendment increasing the size of the Court to 15 which would have allowed him to pack it and get his way. The Court knuckled under at that point. If the Constitution was suspended, why did he have to go through all that? The USSC is meaningless except in the context of the Constitution. Why didn't he just issue more EOs dictating his terms?