SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (105221)7/14/2003 2:37:38 AM
From: spiral3  Respond to of 281500
 
even if no-one knows where they are <g>

I guess you don't really have an answer, despite the fact that they're connected.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (105221)7/14/2003 5:51:04 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Here is a good example of how the "New York Times" twists things.

WHAT RUMSFELD SAID

"It seems to me that the numbers of U.S. forces are unlikely to go up," he said on the NBC News program "Meet the Press." "Now, could they? You bet. If they're needed, they will be there."

THE HEADLINE RUN, FRONT PAGE, ABOVE THE FOLD, BY THE TIMES

"RUMSFELD SAYS IRAQ MAY NEED A LARGER FORCE."

How to lie, and get away with it.

nytimes.com


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News