Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (130155)	7/15/2003 3:10:53 PM
From: DanD	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

<<Unless they screen the building for RF, which is unlikely. Who would want to stay at a hotel where they can't use their WiFi service? >> Ever been to Vegas ? :)

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (130155)	7/16/2003 12:17:57 AM
From: Quincy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Couple questions, Maurice. Is your RoamAD operating cashflow positive? Why is your situation unique relative to similar systems bleeding funds around the world? "but maybe it will be as costs continue to plummet" Access points could drop from $95 to $15. <font color=Blue>Don't care.</font> The advantage of a 1X transceiver is I don't need to be near one and its bills are shared by hundreds to thousands of paying voice customers so I can rely on its coverage. How many folks enter a hotspot that isn't a hotel or airport on a daily basis? 2? 5? What is RoamAD doing that TMobile can't that controls backbone and site costs? "The sneaky little WiFi signals would just permeate the building" Ok, why can't WiFi struggle through drywall?