Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rogerover who wrote (1643)	7/17/2003 3:21:36 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo	Respond to of 3143

Sorry, and I am sure the defendants would like me to make further commentary on this, but I will not do so here and now. They hope I would, because it has become clear that they are quite concerned about these forms, as this is a federal crime, abusing the filing process to attempt to intimidate people, let alone a former client who paid them $300,000 in commissions. So, I repeat: there is quite a bit more evidence that I am not going to share here. In due course, it will all come out. When it does, the defendants are going to have some serious problems explaining their activity. Hint: you've got [former] employees who don't like you very much ;-)...

To: rogerover who wrote (1643)	7/17/2003 3:36:37 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3143

Please tell me you didn't really call it "income" in your court filing. You are not paying attention. When I called it income I was quoting the IRS directly. Comprendes? IRS sent me the records. Now the Court has them. Bonne chance, mes amis, en essayant d'expliquer vos activites penibles. They just tried an encore with their motion to strike and for sanctions. When there's no part of the record to strike what they want struck! lol, just like the phantom income, now phantom strikes... Well, considering all the ghosts - i.e. fake aliases purporting to be traders but really broker/site owners and employees - here at SI and at TP that they controlled, I guess it does have a particular logic to it, all these moves trying to spook me. Except that while they're trying to come across like "Fall of the House of Usher" what they're really producing is more along the lines of "Scooby Doo". It is entertaining, though.