Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (1645)	7/17/2003 4:14:21 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo	Respond to of 3143

This is a civil suit, but as I stated a long time ago, there are many criminal aspects to these claims. Right now, there are serious questions whether or not multiple felonies have been committed. It will be very interesting to see how this plays out as the case proceeds. I wonder how many others have been treated this way by the defendants? Somehow, it is hard for me to believe that what happened to me is some kind of isolated occurrence. Remember: United States Senator Susan Collins and SEC Counsel accused Terra Nova of forging 50 account agreements. I'm not the only one raising these questions, far from it: I'm in very good company. You better believe that sooner or later the evidence developed by Senators Collins and Levin will become an issue in this case. So, when you have some of the defendants claiming they have some right to enforce phantom arbitration agreements I never saw in my life until they introduced them after being sued, and others forging account agreements, you begin to wonder what the heck is actually going on here. Then you have key defendants committing perjury in their declarations, like Philip Berber saying he never did any business in California, and Chris Rea saying he never gave any advice or securities recommendations to anyone ever, really, truly, I swear, but I still do have a 94% accuracy record on all plays but they are not recommendations, really, just a telephone call! These kinds of people stop at nothing to lie, cheat and steal their way to millions, think it's all a big joke, a game, wiping out thousands of honest people who obviously have mental health problems because of course who in their right mind would ever trust brokers and advisers? They have demonstrated that they believe the legal system is theirs to abuse just like the stock markets. I'm doing all I can to ensure that this time around they get brought up short, a rude awakening that they merit.

To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (1645)	7/17/2003 6:17:12 PM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3143

Count, will you answer this: 1. Did you make trades with the defendant during the time period covered by the 1099s? 2. Did you keep a record of those trades? 3. If not, why not? 4. Are you under the impression that you have no responsibility to keep track of your own trades? 5. Did you file tax returns showing these trades? 6. If not, why not? 7. Are you under the impression that you are not responsible for reporting trades if you do not receive a 1099? 8. If you did not receive a timely 1099, did you complain to your broker? 9. If not, why not? 10. Did you receive confirmations from your broker at the time that you made your trades? 11. If so, did you keep a copy of the confirmations? 12. If not, why not? The great Karmack will now predict your answer: "No comment"