Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (171947)	7/17/2003 8:25:59 PM
From: brian1501	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577945

The issue of who provided what has been kicked back and forth over the past month. One minute its the CIA; the next its Brit. Intel. No one on either side of the Atlantic is providing a clear picture. That may be, but the point is still moot. In the speach Bush said British intelligence said it, so what the CIA knew and when is immaterial. That aside, it's preferable to have stuff like that sourced from the CIA, but the Dems trying to trump this up as him lying or misrepresenting are reaching (very far). Brian

To: tejek who wrote (171947)	7/17/2003 10:43:30 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1577945

One final note.......they should not let Bush speak on the subject........he just makes things more confused and he acts and sounds very guilty. What makes it more damning is the fact that they have not found any WMDs...that makes the whole case seem bogus and the war avoidable. In other words, it is clear now that those of us who advocated containment through the UN (remember the UN?) were absolutely correct in our position. Al