To: Bilow who wrote (106217 ) 7/18/2003 3:56:50 AM From: Sully- Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500 I see the real Bilow has come out to play, replete with vile language, open ridicule, the usual deceit, blatant distortions, all while intentionally ignoring all factual evidence that is completely contrary to your premeditatedly misleading POV. Did someone pee in your Wheaties? President Bush not only didn't avoid the words, "imminent threat", he chided those who would wait until the threat was imminent in the State of the Union Address. And President Bush did precisely the same thing when addressing the nation when discussing the Iraq threat. "Imminent threat" was born by democratic politicians & liberal media in response to the SOTUA. It was falsely attributed to President Bush & his Administration by liberal media & democratic politicians. Then it was used by the lieral left to make false accusations to scare voters & sway public opinion.State of the Union Address whitehouse.gov ....Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words, and all recriminations would come too late. Trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is not a strategy, and it is not an option.....President Bush Outlines Iraqi Threat whitehouse.gov ...."Some ask how urgent this danger is to America and the world. The danger is already significant, and it only grows worse with time. If we know Saddam Hussein has dangerous weapons today -- and we do -- does it make any sense for the world to wait to confront him as he grows even stronger and develops even more dangerous weapons?" UYAH