Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (4916)	7/18/2003 10:23:09 AM
From: dantecristo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

Anthony, you're in good company! "Freedom is ANYTHING BUT FREE! Have you ever wondered what happened to the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence? Five signers were captured by the British as traitors, and tortured before they died. Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned. Two lost their sons serving in the Revolutionary Army; another had two sons captured. Nine of the 56 fought and died from wounds or hardships of the Revolutionary War. They signed and they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor. What kind of men were they? Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists. Eleven were merchants, nine were farmers and large plantation owners; men of means, well educated. But they signed the Declaration of Independence knowing full well that the penalty would be death if they were captured. Carter Braxton of Virginia, a wealthy planter and trader, saw his ships swept from the seas by the British Navy. He sold his home and properties to pay his debts, and died in rags. Thomas McKeam was so hounded by the British that he was forced to move his family almost constantly. He served in the Congress without pay, and his family was kept in hiding. His possessions were taken from him, and poverty was his reward. Vandals or soldiers looted the properties of Dillery, Hall, Clymer, Walton, Gwinnett, Heyward, Ruttledge, and Middleton. At the battle of Yorktown, Thomas Nelson Jr, noted that the British General Cornwallis had taken over the Nelson home for his headquarters. He quietly urged General George Washington to open fire. The home was destroyed, and Nelson died bankrupt. Francis Lewis had his home and properties destroyed. The enemy jailed his wife, and she died within a few months. John Hart was driven from his wife's bedside as she was dying. Their 13 children fled for their lives. His fields and his gristmill were laid to waste. For more than a year he lived in forests and caves, returning home to find his wife dead and his children vanished. A few weeks later he died from exhaustion and a broken heart. Norris and Livingston suffered similar fates. Such were the stories and sacrifices of the American Revolution. These were not wild-eyed, rabble-rousing ruffians. They were soft-spoken men of means and education. They had security, but they valued liberty more. Standing tall, straight, and unwavering, they pledged: "For the support of this declaration, with firm reliance on the protection of the divine providence, we mutually pledge to each other, our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor." They gave you and me a free and independent America. The history books never told you a lot about what happened in the Revolutionary War. We didn't fight just the British. We were British subjects at that time and we fougnt our own government! Some of us take these liberties so much for granted, but we shouldn't. So, take a few minutes while enjoying your 4th of July holiday and silently thank these patriots. It's not much to ask for the price they paid. Remember: freedom is never free! I hope you will show your support by please sending this page/link to as many people as you can. It's time we get the word out that patriotism is NOT a sin, and the Fourth of July has more to it than beer, picnics, and baseball games. " w3f.com

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (4916)	7/18/2003 10:37:31 AM
From: StockDung	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12465

I noticed in the superseding indictment they did not accuse you of paying the $30,000 bribe.. That is the way I read it. Guess that means you did not bribe anyone. The 911 stories where the most cruel thing that they accused you of. It was a total lie. Right up there with the Iraq buying uranium from Africa. Peace TheTruthseeker

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (4916)	7/18/2003 11:51:07 AM
From: Anthony@Pacific	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

One final thought on this Who is truly being punished ? The person who is taken away from his children, ( for doing what he believd to be right and good and helpful ) whom he loves more than himself or anything else on this planet. Or the children who lose their loving father at the age of 6 9 and 11 ?

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (4916)	7/18/2003 3:14:28 PM
From: Pluvia	Read Replies (7) \| Respond to of 12465

tony, this indictment has (imo) hit many innocent people hard. if there's anyone who REALLY deserves pity in this mess, its people like bob hansen and archer. and site members that have had to spent thousands of dollars because of problems i believe YOU caused. i think you have taken advantage of people your entire life, and i think you built the ap.com site with the idea of organizing a herd of sheep and then taking advantage of the sheeple. i think you front ran your site members and tried to make a buck off anyone and everyone you could. but, i also think anyone who knew you should have known that's just the person you are... you couldn't be trusted, and 90% of what you say/said is crap. that being said, what breen is doing imo is seriously WRONG. i think he's using intimidation, the law and the power of the us attorney's office in ways that (i think) are ruining this country. if there's any comedy in this situation, it will (IMO) be watching breen try to put you in jail based on things you apparently said/wrote - thereby requiring your word to be credible... and then, the truth of the matter dribbling out, which is (IMO)... everyone (i knew), thought you were full of sh*t and openly laughed at your bs comments behind your back... as much as i don't fall for your "please feel sorry for me because i have small children blaa blaa" routine, i do think breen is and has used the power of his office to make claims against you and others in this mess in ways that disgust me to say i'm american. i have a funny feeling, at the end of the day breen's credibility and conduct will come into serious question at this trial... i'll be watching... cheers steve p

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (4916)	7/21/2003 7:15:39 PM
From: Smiling Bob	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

Might be time to "review" your own thread and actions Message 12573226 To:Jon Scott This is a response to a deleted message From: Anthony@Pacific Friday, Jan 14, 2000 11:53 AM View Replies (3) \| Respond to of 5863 Jon , I have reviewed your thread and id say you have some major problems...... I think you need an atty, to pass opinions on what yoiu are doing. Just a friendly tip there ---------------------------------------------------------- Message 13547087 To:scottonstocks who wrote (3052) From: Anthony@Pacific Wednesday, May 3, 2000 12:15 AM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5863 SCOTTonPOS-TURDS<------------As it turns out Scammy Scott has no paying subscribers !! Yet every post is a SEC violation in and of itself!! Scammy Scott Gets termintaed..see ya !!! --------------------------------------------------------- Message 13570285 To:T. Peirce Baker who wrote (3085) From: Anthony@Pacific Thursday, May 4, 2000 3:08 PM View Replies (4) \| Respond to of 5863 I have a private service..but his claims were ilegal..you wont catch me making claims like he does..evn though I believ my track record is untouchable by him..iuts really simple..its a vilotion to pump your own site...on SI.. I have no motive since it wasnt I who turned himn in ------------------------------------------------------ Message 13056593 To:scottonstocks who wrote (2881) From: Anthony@Pacific Sunday, Mar 5, 2000 1:05 PM View Replies (3) \| Respond to of 5863 I gave you a freindly tip, but as GOD is my witness ,, I never copmplained to SI or anything about yourself promotion.....BUt now ......well thats a differnt matter.. You took up a fight with me and I believe that what you do is wrong...primarily for the following two reasons..you reccommend stocks that shouldnt be bought and ..You have no Fundamental basis for your picks..They are mostly thing and unfollowed that are easily moved by momentum and or collusion... Now if you can tell me where Sketchers or IPET or AOL will be in a year, Im all ears. BUt first answer my question..you never answered ..are you and Jon Scott ...one and the same person? Yes or No? --------------------------------------------------------- Message 13780577 To:scottonstocks who wrote (49) From: Anthony@Pacific Thursday, May 25, 2000 10:08 PM View Replies (2) \| Respond to of 442 Ah the scammer from the abyss has puked up a few syllables...everyone bow down to the Most exposed paid Tout on CNBC..