SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (172133)7/21/2003 1:13:21 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579954
 
Once again, and for the last time, the moral justification for the war is not what sold the Amer. public on this war

Once again I'm not talking about what sold the American public on this war.


Well, I thought we were talking about Neocon's post.......when did his become your position? I am assuming they must be identical.

I am offended that you think we are stupid enough to sit here while you all change your story

Once again, I am not Bush, nor am I a member of the Bush administration, nor am I in this post or in this conversation defending Bush. From the beginning my support for the war had many reasons, including the WMD threat but those reasons where not limited to the threat. I'm not changing my story. In fact what put my support for the war over the top was the thought that the war would cause less death and suffering then years more of Saddam + sanctions.

But from Bush on down, the story has changed from one of finding WMD to one of a humane undertaking for the Iraqi people. Let me just say, this sudden change of position stretches one's ability to believe.

As for you, I am glad you have consolidated your views on the war. Prior to the war, you were very vague in terms of a position and unsure whether you thought the war was a good thing. What solidified your position.....the lack of WMD; excuse me, I meant the suffering of the Iraqi people?

Save it for your nephews and nieces

Don't really talk to them much about politics. Most of them are too young.


I thought in the GOP handbook it says to start them before the age of 3? <g>

or your NRA meetings

Never attended one but if I did presumably the meeting would be about resisting gun control and/or internal NRA business. The war in Iraq would probably be off topic.


Once again, you stretch my belief system. I have to believe Iraq is a topic of conversation if for no other reason then the vast array of guns used over there.

ted