Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (1772)	7/22/2003 12:26:35 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3143

because in so doing by definition it also insulted the Court, who took my brief seriously I'm sure that the court won't feel insulted that you asked that the Judge be removed from the case.

To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (1772)	7/22/2003 12:30:15 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo	Respond to of 3143

Incidentally Cyber/Schwab counsel did not address all issues raised by my petition. 1. He completely ignored my argument against retroactivity - Curiously, in one sentence Schwab counsel said I have not shown that they owed me any duty of loyalty before I became a Cyber client; then in the next he says the contract should be retroactive to that time when they owed me no loyalty! LOL. 2. He completely neglected to make a single statement concerning the minor fact that I never received, read or signed any arbitration agreements they are trying to enforce. - Small omission there! Just a minor issue, whether or not someone ever agreed at all, read or signed anything. Let's see if the Court doesn't notice this...