Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (1827)	7/22/2003 1:50:52 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3143

Answer last question first: "What do you mean, an African or a European swallow?" CYA! What happened through the lawyers Tim Luke arranged in Santa Monica is why I did not want to give out the law firm info. The only ones I was prepared to trust with that info were those who trusted me with who they were and why they thought they should be calling. I think that's reasonable. I did not ask for "personal info" as you suggest, except which broker and site they used and how to reach them. Seems to me any plaintiff should at a minimum have given that info, and many did. Don't see any problems there. They have not complained about it. In Cali that firm received I don't know how many calls from people sounding like lunatics when unfortunately Tim told a few people who it was. Well, of course this is what the defendants would want. Have 25 loon plaintiffs call up discrediting the entire case. As a result, they refused to take the case. So, what I was trying to prevent happened anyway. If anything, I should have been even more circumspect about that firm.