Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (172288)	7/22/2003 2:24:10 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577895

Al, I see absolutely nothing on a "Bush Knew" conspiracy in those links. All I see is bickering over procedures and lack of progress, along with the same yellow-bellied journalism typical of the UK Guardian. Who claimed that bush knew? The double-standard that you demonstrate between the Clintons and George W. Bush. If years of politically-motivated investigations on Bush yield NADA, you'd still be belly-aching about a Bush conspiracy. You don't know that without some serious speculation. All we know that years of politically motivated investigations on Hillary yielded NADA. Hillary's "Bush Knew" stunt was a prime example. Link of when she said that? Personally, I think the Dems are desperate here. The Reps investigated and obsessively criticized Clinton during his entire tenure but they are admired in your eyes. The Dems, the press and a number of republicans have questioned where the intel came from that took us into a MAJOR war and they are traitors, or desperate, or treasonous even... bush may have taken us to war over flawed or cooked intel and you think that should be swept under the carpet... bush decided to go to war early last year and made the "facts" fit his purpose, if that's not clearly a dangerous issue to you, in the backdrop of a pre-emptive doctrine, then I give up. And yet you accuse me of double standard and the press and anyone who wants to know the story as desperate. . I am in total disbelief that you can't see the potential for abuse of power that needs to be reined in and controlled. Al

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (172288)	7/22/2003 4:14:52 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577895

Leave the current flap over mis-intelligence out of it for a moment. Open your eyes to the political motivations of Bush's accusers. They've been throwing mud at Bush for months, even years now, hoping to find something that sticks. Hillary's "Bush Knew" stunt was a prime example. Even you couldn't provide any evidence that Bush had advance knowledge of 9/11. Yet you say Hillary had "vision"? Bullcrap. If you think Bush's enemies "have been throwing mud for months, even years", you ain't seen nothing. From where I'm sitting, he's been on an extended holiday but its over now. He will be held accountable for everything he does from this point forward. ted