Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (1913)	7/22/2003 4:46:20 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo	Respond to of 3143

Oh, and let's see if Mr. Rea dares commit perjury again, this time before the Justices of the Court of Appeal. I didn't deploy all of my evidence in the Appendix. There will be more coming if he lies under oath again.

To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (1913)	7/22/2003 5:24:01 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3143

you avoided the questions were you still trading off of TP's trading opinions when you copied the chat logs? Or did you go back and get the logs after you started with legal action? How is it that you had access to their archives? But to address a couple of my concerns here: -what evidence does the court have that the logs that you are providing as evidence are real and have not been tampered with? -You asserted that the archives were destroyed. But you state "how's he going to argue those?" If they were destroyed, there is nothing to argue. Back to my earlier questions: were you still trading off of TP's recommendations when you started personally archiving the chat logs? did you have access to TP's archives? If so, was it legitimate access?