SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (1920)7/22/2003 5:29:09 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3143
 
I'm not going to discuss those logs except to say that if Rea lies under oath again I'll be introducing some sworn affidavits attesting to their authenticity.

That's a wee warning Rea might care to heed.

Further, how do you argue with a photograph? He going to say the photos are forged?

You see, if Rea continues down the path he started upon, if he digs his hole deeper, I doubt the Court of Appeal is going to be very lenient with him. It's his choice now. From what I learned of the man, I think he'll probably try to brazen it out. Well, when he does, he'll be in a difficult place, then, and so will be his co-defendants, who relied on his perjury before the same Court.



To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (1920)7/22/2003 5:30:42 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3143
 
Now make up your mind. First you try and say they were not recs; then you say maybe the logs aren't authentic; then you finally say maybe I should be suing myself...

lol. What's in that Pepsi?