Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lou Weed who wrote (107738)	7/24/2003 2:04:51 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

In those terms yes, but i think most americans dont know which is which when it comes to saddam and bin laden. Hell, i think a recent poll had joe lieberman with 40% name recognition and he ran for VP. And he was leading in recognition among the presidential candidates.

To: Lou Weed who wrote (107738)	7/24/2003 2:14:33 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

It's not the least "appalling" to blame Saddam for the WTC. He would have done it if he could! AND it would have been small potatoes compared to any number of other things that he HAD done. To say it is "appalling" is to imply that it's equally wrong to mistakenly accuse a serial murderer of a murder he didn't commit, and to accuse an innocent man of murder. It's not. The US does not bomb US citizens on US ground using US civilian airliners. To think that it does, now that is appalling.