Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (172618)	7/25/2003 6:07:38 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572321

Ted, Bush is vulnerable. No time to be nice! It's more like desperation on the part of the Dems, something I already recognized well before Clinton chimed in on the whole issue of Iraq intelligence. In the latest poll, Hillary and Bush statistically are in a dead heat! Tell me, does anyone in the gang of nine really inspire you? The notion that Hillary is even being considered for 2004 kind of tells you how sorry the field of Bush-challengers are. Tenchusatsu

To: tejek who wrote (172618)	7/25/2003 6:30:13 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572321

Ted, here is an editorial from someone (a Bush-hater, no less) who also thinks the Democrats are walking into a political trap: tallahassee.com Still, the real question for those who prefer their Bush presidencies in one-term doses is not whether today's attacks are fair, but whether they are smart. My instinct is "no." At some point - three months or six months or 12 months from now - indisputable proof of Saddam's weapons will emerge. When that happens, what will shrill, wrongheaded liberals who weirdly sound as if they're staking everything on Saddam Hussein's honesty seem to be but ... a bunch of shrill, wrongheaded liberals! ... My own judgment, however, is that the boomerang risk when Saddam's weapons are eventually found is far, far greater than any credibility hit Bush will take. My point to the left: Why risk this boomerang when there are better, truer ways to bash Bush? Tenchusatsu