SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (172686)7/27/2003 3:41:13 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574679
 
DR,

re: I wonder why the administration doesn't use it to fight the liberal lie that the economic downturn happened on Bush's watch?

Because if you want to rate a presidency by a stock chart, Bush has a long way to go to match Clinton. Look at the complete terms, and I'll let you do the % returns:

bigcharts.marketwatch.com

Another interesting page:

cnponline.org

It's my humble opinion that the President has little impact on the short term economy, but can have a significant impact long term.

Even though you are a talk show conservative, you can't have it both ways. Does Clinton get credit for the prosperity during his term, and Bush take the heat for his term? Or do agree with me that these guys don't have a short term impact.

John



To: i-node who wrote (172686)7/27/2003 6:05:55 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1574679
 
I wonder why the administration doesn't use it to fight the liberal lie that the economic downturn happened on Bush's watch?

That's because the economy did not crash; the Naz did! You're funny!


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News