SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (36638)7/29/2003 1:54:11 AM
From: BubbaFred  Respond to of 74559
 
Offshore Funds Take Flight Again
With worries about war and SARS fading, they moved up
asia.businessweek.com:/print/magazine/content/03_31/b3844143_mz035.htm?mz

After more than three years of dodging declining markets, money managers greeted a surprisingly bullish second quarter with sighs of relief. With the Iraq war officially over and the memory of SARS fading, markets everywhere moved up smartly. Indeed, every one of the 500 mutual funds managed outside the U.S. and tracked by BusinessWeek's quarterly Offshore Funds Scorecard finished the quarter with positive returns. And more than 96% turned in double-digit gains for the quarter ended June 30. A look at the funds' 12-month performance, of course, is more sobering: Only five of the top 25 had positive returns over a yearlong period. That's a reminder that quarterly performances can vary widely.

In the latest quarter, German and European equity funds came out on top, with funds focusing on German stocks taking six of the top 10 spots in the ranking. Biotech and European small-company funds also did well. Capital outflows from the U.S. certainly helped buoy the performance of non-U.S. markets: In the first five months of this year, U.S. investors snapped up $25.5 billion in foreign equities, mostly in Europe and Asia outside of Japan, says Morgan Stanley.

The gold medal went to DG Lux Lacuna Apo BioTech, the best performer among the 500 funds, clocking a sizzling 57.66% return. Although run jointly from the German town of Regensberg and Zurich, the fund, like most of its biotech counterparts in Europe, profited by investing in the red-hot American biotech industry. The fund holds 75% of its investments in small and midsize companies based in the U.S., and it doesn't plan to tinker with that strategy. "Investors who are interested in growth must sooner or later invest in biotech, where share prices are growing an average of 30% to 35% per year," says Christian Pistor, manager of research at four-year-old Lacuna, which has a total of $170 million under management.

Offshore funds are typically based in tax havens such as Luxembourg and the Isle of Man and cannot be marketed to U.S. residents because they don't file reports with the Securities & Exchange Commission. But they represent the collective judgment of fund managers from around the world. Standard & Poor's, like BusinessWeek a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, did the number-crunching for the scorecard.

The biggest surprise of the quarter was the sudden thaw in the three-year Teutonic freeze. German markets have been among the worst global performers since 2000. But this year, they staged an impressive comeback, with the DAX blue-chip index jumping 13.38% so far this year and 40% in the second quarter alone. "There have been a few glimmers of hope [for] the economy," says Frederic de Merode, a portfolio strategist at Fidelity International in London. "Business confidence is beginning to pick up and unemployment is falling after rising for a year."

Some would say German equities had nowhere to go but up. They were 75% off their highs of spring, 2000, before the recent bounce. That made the stocks appear pretty cheap to value investors. Throw in some encouraging noises from Chancellor Gerhard Schröder that Berlin is getting serious about structural reforms of labor laws and pensions, and the story starts to look promising. No one is saying that the German economy is out of the woods yet, but there has been enough encouraging news to entice buyers back into the market. Indeed, total monthly equity turnover on German stock exchanges jumped 22% in June, to $91 billion, according to the Deutsche Borse Group in Frankfurt.

Beaten-down German blue chips have attracted the lion's share of money. Markus Zipperer, who manages No. 6-ranked CS EF (Lux) Germany fund at Credit Suisse AM Funds in Frankfurt, tapped into Deutsche Telekom for its high cash flow. He also maintained his holdings in Siemens, whose stock soared, along with other stocks in the tech sector. Across Europe, many of the best-performing funds invested in telecom and Internet stocks, which may have hit bottom. Investors say these companies were helped by the combination of strong cash flow and a weak dollar. Many small-cap stocks also rode the coattails of bigger stocks that rose. "After the Iraq war, the big-cap stocks were the first to move," notes Ed Burke, fund manager at the INVESCO UK Equity Fund. "But then the initial leadership in the market was reversed" as small caps advanced.

Guido Marveggio, portfolio manager at the No. 2-ranked Special Europe Stock Fund run by Julius Baer in Zurich, saw his small- and midcap-heavy fund soar 47% in the second quarter. Among the best performers: German telecom firm freenet.de and Internet service provider T-Online International. But while Marveggio is optimistic about certain stocks, he's only cautiously positive about small caps as a whole. "After this rebound, the potential is not that large anymore," he says. "If the U.S. is not growing [strongly], Europe will have to struggle."

Success in biotechnology, of course, depends on factors other than the performance of national economies. With huge research costs and little revenue, small biotech stocks typically live or die by the government drug-approval process. Top-ranked Lacuna scooped up shares in U.S. biotechs last fall -- a time when risk-averse investors were giving them a wide berth. Lacuna's bet paid off in the second quarter, when the Food & Drug Administration cleared six new drugs -- three of them made by leading picks of the fund. These included Houston-based Tanox Inc. and San Francisco-based Genentech Inc., both of which make Xolair, an asthma drug; Novato (Calif).-based BioMarin Pharmaceutical, which produces Aldurazyme, an enzyme- replacement therapy to counteract a life-threatening disease called MPS I; and Livingston (N.J.)-based Columbia Laboratories, manufacturer of testosterone enhancer Striant. All told, Lacuna's portfolio, which holds 80% of its investments in biotech companies and 20% in medtech companies, paid off in spades. "When a drug receives approval, small and midsize stocks valued between $250 million and $1 billion can see revenues grow by 100% in a year," says Pistor.

The stellar second-quarter returns weren't limited to small biotechs. No. 4-ranked Fortis L Equity Biotech World C gained 39% in the second quarter and 21% in the past 12 months investing in mostly large-cap biotech stocks. Fund manager Gerd Philippaerts likes that these stocks march to their own beat. "Unlike technology companies, these do not depend on the [economy] to have a high-growth profile," he says. Philippaerts is bullish on Genentech, which has made great strides in cancer research. Philippaerts also is a fan of Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc. and its new bone marrow cancer-fighting drug Velcade, which was approved by the FDA in May. Talk about big bets: Millennium, Genentech, and Amgen account for 27% of the Fortis fund.

In Asia, the big question is whether Japan is back as an investment destination. The Nikkei 225 is up 12.08% this year, and some analysts still see many Japanese stocks as undervalued. "Japan Inc. has slowly but steadily restructured and reduced its cost structure, which will lead to better earnings," says Shigeda Kouda, manager of Goldman, Sachs & Co.'s Japan Fund. But the view of Japa-nese markets is mixed. "Stocks are cheap in Japan, but cheap doesn't mean value," says David Herro, manager of the Kansas City (Mo.)-based Oakmark International Fund. He notes that average return on equity for Japanese companies is 6% to 7%, compared with 13% to 14% for Europe and 15% to 16% for the U.S.

After getting hammered in the first quarter, Korean stocks rebounded strongly, with the Kospi index finishing up 31.3% in the three months ended June 30. The award for the most impressive comeback goes to Jardine Fleming's Korea Fund. It was the scoreboard's worst-performing fund in the first quarter, when it lost 19%, but it roared back with a 36.95% return, ranking No. 11 this quarter. The fund's two largest holdings are Samsung Electronics Co. and steel company Posco, both of which have benefited from strong exports to China.

As always, the fortunes of offshore funds are tethered to the world's major economies and equity markets. There's growing concern that currencies in Asia are being held artificially low by their central banks to pump up exports. If they are allowed to appreciate against the dollar, Asian exporters' earnings could plummet. Plus, with a strong euro chipping away at corporate profits in Europe, markets may have a difficult time keeping up the momentum. The upshot is if there are no signs soon of a broad-based economic recovery, fund managers may have to start running for cover all over again.

By Frederik Balfour in Hong Kong, with Gail Edmondson in Frankfurt, Laura Cohn in London, and Irene M. Kunii in Tokyo



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (36638)7/29/2003 1:55:23 AM
From: BubbaFred  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Outsourcing: Make Way for China
It's fast becoming an important hub for IT services. Move over, India

If you visit Tom Reilly's office in Guangzhou, you may have trouble hearing above all the construction noise. Workers at the Cap Gemini Ernst & Young facility in the southern Chinese city hammer away even as employees tap at their computer keyboards. Since it began in 2001 in a tiny, windowless room, the Cap Gemini center has grown to employ 120 people doing everything from entering sales data for a Hong Kong convenience-store chain to processing cargo information for a Norwegian shipping line. And Reilly expects the staff to reach 500 within 18 months. "It's the smell of progress," he says, sniffing the fumes of wet paint permeating the office.

That progress is starting to spread across China. After emerging as the world's hottest manufacturing hub, China is joining English-speaking countries such as India and the Philippines as a key destination for outsourced service jobs. Near Guangzhou's airport, a call center run by Hong Kong's PacificNet Inc. employs 2,000 Chinese manning the phones for telecom and insurance companies in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and China. PacificNet plans to have a staff of 5,000 by the end of next year. Accenture Ltd. has opened a software-development unit in the northern coastal city of Dalian that will soon boast 1,000 staff. And at its new center in Shanghai, BearingPoint Inc. (formerly KPMG Consulting) aims to quadruple its staff, to 600, by yearend 2004.

So far, China's role is largely focused on providing back-office support for financial service, telecom, software, and retail companies in neighboring Asian countries. Operators can easily talk to people in Hong Kong and Taiwan in their own languages. China also has plenty of Japanese and Korean speakers. But it is making inroads as an outsourcing base for English-speaking nations, a business dominated by India, because of the influx of Western multinationals who now are bringing back-office work to China. ConnectITChina, a Shanghai consultancy, estimates China's software outsourcing revenue will more than double, to $5 billion, by 2005. Gartner Inc. predicts that by 2007 China will pull in $27 billion for IT services, including call centers and back-office work, matching India.

China's ascent could inflame an already heated debate in the U.S. about companies sending work abroad. With the U.S. economy still struggling and the jobless rate at 6.4%, lawmakers in several states want to make it harder for governments to contract work to low-wage countries. India is the center of attention. But China, which many Americans view as a political and economic rival, is likely to be a bigger lightning rod for outsourcing foes.

The economic forces driving work to China are powerful, though. There is huge demand inside China for skilled service workers to meet the needs of both the country's own booming economy and of the thousands of multinationals that have set up manufacturing bases on the mainland. Many companies in Greater China are, for instance, turning to outside providers for information technology needs rather than doing the work in-house. "There's massive need for data entry from banks, insurance companies, and hospitals," says PacificNet CEO Tony C.W. Tong. Operators at Tong's call center start at salaries of $150 per month; in Hong Kong they average $1,300. PacificNet serves Chinese cellular carriers and is mulling a Dalian office for Japanese clients.

Chinese officials aim to give this burgeoning industry a push, by forging partnerships with multinationals to train information technology engineers. For example, IBM has signed deals to train 100,000 software specialists in various Chinese cities over three years. Indian computer-training companies are teaching 20,000 students in more than 100 centers across China. Gartner figures China needs 4 million more IT professionals to meet future demand.

Foreign IT services companies also are using China as a base for winning business in Asia. One reason Accenture picked Dalian for its rapidly expanding software-development office, which opened in mid-March, is that the city is a major hub for Japanese and Korean multinationals. When it comes to working in those languages, says Accenture China manager Gong Li, "it's much easier for our people in China" than for those in India or the Philippines.

China's low-cost talent is another edge. Although India is a powerhouse in high-end IT services, latecomers these days must pay higher wages for experienced engineers. That's one reason BearingPoint chose Shanghai for its new software-development center, says the company's Greater China President, Bryan Huang. BearingPoint pays $500 a month for engineers in Shanghai. In India, he says, the pay would be $700, and $4,000 in the U.S. "Where can we sustain our cost advantage for the next 40 years?" Huang asks. "We're convinced that China is the only place."

American manufacturing companies are discovering that cost advantage, too. Sweetheart Cup Co., an Owings Mills (Md.) maker of plastic plates, cups, and utensils for customers such as McDonald's and Wendy's International, hired consultancy E5 Systems of Waltham, Mass., to develop a system to track production processes at its 14 North American factories. E5 is doing the job in Shenzhen, where it has a joint venture. Sweetheart figures it saves 40% by sourcing in China rather than India. In a business where pennies matter, "cost is a consideration in everything we do," says John McGregor, Sweetheart's chief information officer.

Several big Indian IT-services companies are determined to tap China for their own advantage. In fact, Gartner predicts Indian firms will eventually control 40% of China's IT services exports. Satyam Computer Services Ltd., India's fourth-biggest supplier, set up a 27-person development center in Shanghai last year with plans to expand. Satyam Asia-Pacific Chief Virender Aggarwal says his sales team is telling him that China presents more opportunity than any other country, mainly from multinationals that need reliable software support for their expanding mainland businesses. India's Tata Consultancy Services has a 100-person software center in Hangzhou, near Shanghai. Midsize Indian players are moving to China, too. In February, iGATE Global Solutions, a $90 million Bangalore software provider, set up in the eastern city of Wuxi. So did $91 million MphasiS Group, which in October bought a 50-employee Chinese software developer in Shanghai. So far, 14 Indian companies have set up shop in China, says India's National Association of Software & Service Companies.

No big Chinese rivals for the multinational outsourcing firms have yet emerged -- although that may soon change. Piracy fears, relatively poor English, and a lack of high-level international quality certification have held Chinese upstarts back. But with training and experience, such obstacles are surmountable. And expertise in written and spoken Asian languages will remain an edge. By honing skills in burgeoning markets close to home, China's IT outsourcing industry is sure to get up to speed fast.

By Bruce Einhorn in Guangzhou, with Manjeet Kripalani in Bombay

asia.businessweek.com:/print/magazine/content/03_31/b3844132_mz033.htm?mz