SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (172845)7/30/2003 10:45:54 AM
From: i-node  Respond to of 1571153
 
That one of the good answers why terrorism isn't the rampant threat that people act like it is.

This is one of the most ridiculous remarks I've ever seen posted on this board.

How long does it take to forget about 9/11 and the 3,000 people who were slaughtered there?

The remark is downright offensive if you stop and think about it.



To: Road Walker who wrote (172845)7/30/2003 1:13:02 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571153
 
JF, Against Osama bin Laden and his followers, certainly. Against the Taliban, unfortunatly, no. Are you saying the Talaban was responsible for 9/11?

I guess you like to make clear distinctions between terrorists and those who harbor them. So were you against the attack on the Taliban after 9/11? If not, what changed?

Tenchusatsu


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News